Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33060565›Full record

SynthesisNature communications2020

Synthesis and systematic review of reported neonatal SARS-CoV-2 infections.

Roberto Raschetti, Alexandre J Vivanti, Christelle Vauloup-Fellous, Barbara Loi, Alexandra Benachi, Daniele De Luca

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Nature communications, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 165 papers, 11 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
165citing papers in PubMed, 11 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

165 citing papers in PubMed, 11 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

105 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Roberto RaschettiDivision of Pediatrics and Neonatal Critical Care, "A.Béclère" Medical Centre, Paris Saclay University Hospitals, APHP, Clamart, France.
Alexandre J VivantiDivision of Obstetrics and Gynecology, "A.Béclère" Medical Centre, Paris Saclay University Hospitals, APHP, Clamart, France.ORCID 0000-0002-4921-0047
Christelle Vauloup-FellousDivision of Virology, "Paul Brousse" Hospital, Paris Saclay University Hospitals, APHP, Villejuif, France.
Barbara LoiDivision of Pediatrics and Neonatal Critical Care, "A.Béclère" Medical Centre, Paris Saclay University Hospitals, APHP, Clamart, France.
Alexandra BenachiDivision of Obstetrics and Gynecology, "A.Béclère" Medical Centre, Paris Saclay University Hospitals, APHP, Clamart, France.ORCID 0000-0001-6045-0765
Daniele De LucaDivision of Pediatrics and Neonatal Critical Care, "A.Béclère" Medical Centre, Paris Saclay University Hospitals, APHP, Clamart, France. dm.deluca@icloud.com.ORCID 0000-0002-3846-4834

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A number of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) infections have been reported in neonates. Here, we aim to clarify the transmission route, clinical features and outcomes of these infections. We present a meta-analysis of 176 published cases of neonatal SARS-CoV-2 infections that were defined by at least one positive nasopharyngeal swab and/or the presence of specific IgM. We report that 70% and 30% of infections are due to environmental and vertical transmission, respectively. Our analysis shows that 55% of infected neonates developed COVID-19; the most common symptoms were fever (44%), gastrointestinal (36%), respiratory (52%) and neurological manifestations (18%), and lung imaging was abnormal in 64% of cases. A lack of mother-neonate separation from birth is associated with late SARS-CoV-2 infection (OR 4.94 (95% CI: 1.98-13.08), p = 0.0002; adjusted OR 6.6 (95% CI: 2.6-16), p < 0.0001), while breastfeeding is not (OR 0.35 (95% CI: 0.09-1.18), p = 0.10; adjusted OR 2.2 (95% CI: 0.7-6.5), p = 0.148). Our findings add to the literature on neonatal SARS-CoV-2 infections.

Indexed as

BetacoronavirusCoronavirus InfectionsCOVID-19FemaleHumansInfant, NewbornLungMaternal ExposurePandemicsPneumonia, ViralSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID33060565
PMCPMC7566441

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.