Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33060166›Full record

ReviewEuropean respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society2020

Lung regeneration: implications of the diseased niche and ageing.

M Camila Melo-Narváez, John Stegmayr, Darcy E Wagner, Mareike Lehmann

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. The importance of mechanical forces in chronic respiratory diseases.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2026
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Innovative three-dimensional models for understanding mechanisms underlying lung diseases: powerful tools for translational research.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2023
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Repairing damaged lungs using regenerative therapy.Current opinion in pharmacology · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

M Camila Melo-NarváezResearch Unit Lung Repair and Regeneration, Helmholtz Zentrum München, German Research Center for Environmental Health, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, University Hospital Grosshadern, Member of the German Center of Lung Research (DZL), Munich, Germany.
John StegmayrLung Bioengineering and Regeneration, Department of Experimental Medical Sciences, Wallenberg Centre for Molecular Medicine, Stem Cell Center, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8167-9259
Darcy E WagnerLung Bioengineering and Regeneration, Department of Experimental Medical Sciences, Wallenberg Centre for Molecular Medicine, Stem Cell Center, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3794-1309
Mareike LehmannResearch Unit Lung Repair and Regeneration, Helmholtz Zentrum München, German Research Center for Environmental Health, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, University Hospital Grosshadern, Member of the German Center of Lung Research (DZL), Munich, Germany mareike.lehmann@helmholtz-muenchen.de.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8601-8206
Helmholtz Zentrum München · DELund University · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Most chronic and acute lung diseases have no cure, leaving lung transplantation as the only option. Recent work has improved our understanding of the endogenous regenerative capacity of the lung and has helped identification of different progenitor cell populations, as well as exploration into inducing endogenous regeneration through pharmaceutical or biological therapies. Additionally, alternative approaches that aim at replacing lung progenitor cells and their progeny through cell therapy, or whole lung tissue through bioengineering approaches, have gained increasing attention. Although impressive progress has been made, efforts at regenerating functional lung tissue are still ineffective. Chronic and acute lung diseases are most prevalent in the elderly and alterations in progenitor cells with ageing, along with an increased inflammatory milieu, present major roadblocks for regeneration. Multiple cellular mechanisms, such as cellular senescence and mitochondrial dysfunction, are aberrantly regulated in the aged and diseased lung, which impairs regeneration. Existing as well as new human

Indexed as

Lung DiseasesLung TransplantationAgedAgingHumansLungRegeneration

Identifiers

PMID33060166
PMCPMC9488855
OpenAlexW3093159324

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.