Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33060145›Full record

ArticleJournal for immunotherapy of cancer2020

Clinical, FDG-PET and molecular markers of immune checkpoint inhibitor response in patients with metastatic Merkel cell carcinoma.

Alison M Weppler, Andrew Pattison, Prachi Bhave, Paolo De Ieso, Jeanette Raleigh, Athena Hatzimihalis, Anthony J Gill, Shiva Balachander, Jason Callahan, Margaret Chua and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal for immunotherapy of cancer, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Efficacy of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors and Oncoviruses in Solid Tumors.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Tumour burden and efficacy of immune-checkpoint inhibitors.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2022
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Alison M Weppler *Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-3769-490X
Andrew Pattison *Department of Clinical Pathology and Centre for Cancer Research, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Prachi BhaveDepartment of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Paolo De IesoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Jeanette RaleighDepartment of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Athena HatzimihalisDepartment of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Anthony J GillCancer Diagnosis and Pathology Group, Kolling Institute of Medical Research, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Shiva BalachanderDepartment of Clinical Pathology and Centre for Cancer Research, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Jason CallahanDepartment of Molecular Imaging and Therapeutic Nuclear Medicine, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Margaret ChuaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
George Au-YeungDepartment of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Grant A McArthurDepartment of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Rodney J HicksDepartment of Molecular Imaging and Therapeutic Nuclear Medicine, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Richard W Tothill *Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Shahneen Sandhu *Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia Shahneen.Sandhu@petermac.org.
Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre · AUThe University of Melbourne · AUThe University of Sydney · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMetastatic Merkel cell carcinoma (mMCC) is an aggressive neuroendocrine malignancy of the skin with a poor prognosis. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have shown substantial efficacy and favorable safety in clinical trials.

methodsMedical records of patients (pts) with mMCC treated with ICIs from August 2015 to December 2018 at Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre in Australia were analyzed. Response was assessed with serial imaging, the majority with FDG-PET/CT scans. RNA sequencing and immunohistochemistry for PD-L1, CD3 and Merkel cell polyomavirus (MCPyV) on tumor samples was performed.

results23 pts with mMCC were treated with ICIs. A median of 8 cycles (range 1 to 47) were administered, with treatment ongoing in 6 pts. Objective responses (OR) were observed in 14 pts (61%): 10 (44%) complete responses (CR) and 4 (17%) partial responses (PR). Median time to response was 8 weeks (range 6 to 12) and 12-month progression-free survival rate was 39%. Increased OR were seen in pts aged less than 75 (OR 80% vs 46%), no prior history of chemotherapy (OR 64% vs 50%), patients with an immune-related adverse event (OR 100% vs 43%) and in MCPyV-negative tumors (OR 69% vs 43%). Pts with a CR had lower mean metabolic tumor volume on baseline FDG-PET/CT scan (CR: 35.7 mL, no CR: 187.8 mL, p=0.05). There was no correlation between PD-L1 positivity and MCPyV status (p=0.764) or OR (p=0.245). 10 pts received radiation therapy (RT) during ICI: 4 pts started RT concurrently (OR 75%, CR 50%), 3 pts had isolated ICI-resistant lesions successfully treated with RT and 3 pts with multisite progression continued to progress despite RT. Overall, 6 pts (26%) had grade 1-2 immune-related adverse events.

conclusionICIs showed efficacy and safety in mMCC consistent with trial data. Clinical and imaging predictors of response were identified.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overFemaleFluorodeoxyglucose F18HumansImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsMaleMerkel cell polyomavirusMiddle AgedNeoplasm MetastasisPositron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyRetrospective StudiesFluorodeoxyglucose F18Immune Checkpoint Inhibitorsgene expression profilingimmunotherapyskin neoplasmstumor biomarkers

Identifiers

PMID33060145
PMCPMC7566424
OpenAlexW3092716988

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.