Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33060102›Full record

SynthesisAJNR. American journal of neuroradiology2020

Location-Specific ASPECTS Paradigm in Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

S M Seyedsaadat, A A Neuhaus, J M Pederson, W Brinjikji, A A Rabinstein, D F Kallmes

Open access · hybridAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Eloquence-based reperfusion scoring and its ability to predict post-thrombectomy disability and functional status.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

S M SeyedsaadatFrom the Department of Radiology (S.M.S., W.B., D.F.K.).ORCID 0000-0002-8219-6144
A A NeuhausMedical School (A.A.N.), University of Oxford, Oxford, England.ORCID 0000-0003-2177-2387
J M PedersonDepartment of Veterinary and Biomedical Sciences (J.M.P.), University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota jpederson@supedit.com.ORCID 0000-0003-2551-4828
W BrinjikjiFrom the Department of Radiology (S.M.S., W.B., D.F.K.).ORCID 0000-0001-5271-5524
A A RabinsteinDepartment of Neurology (A.A.R.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.ORCID 0000-0001-8359-2838
D F KallmesFrom the Department of Radiology (S.M.S., W.B., D.F.K.).ORCID 0000-0002-8495-0040
Norwegian Womens Public Health Association · NOMayo Clinic · USUniversity of Minnesota · USUniversity of Oxford · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWeighting neuroimaging findings based on eloquence can improve the predictive value of ASPECTS, possibly aiding in informed treatment decisions for acute ischemic stroke. PURPOSE: Our aim was to study the contribution of region-specific ASPECTS infarction to acute ischemic stroke outcomes. DATA SOURCES: We searched MEDLINE and EMBASE for reports on ASPECTS in patients with acute ischemic stroke from 2000 to March 2019. STUDY SELECTION: Two investigators independently reviewed articles and extracted data. Three-month poor functional outcome defined as mRS >2 was the primary end point. DATA ANALYSIS: A random-effects meta-analysis was performed to compare the association between infarct and mRS >2 among ASPECTS regions. Subanalyses included the following: laterality of stroke (left/right), imaging technique (NCCT or advanced imaging with DWI, CTP, or CTA), and interventional technique (IV-tPA/conservative management or mechanical thrombectomy). DATA SYNTHESIS: M6 infarct was most associated with poor functional outcome (OR = 3.26; 95% CI, 2.21-4.80; LIMITATIONS: Limitations were the heterogeneity of time points, neuroimaging modalities, and interventional techniques; limited studies for inclusion; publication bias among some comparisons; and the retrospective nature of included studies.

conclusionsOur study indicated an unequal impact of some ASPECTS subregions in predicting outcomes of patients with acute ischemic stroke. Stroke laterality, imaging technique, and interventional technique subgroup analyses showed no differences among ASPECTS regions in predicting outcome. Investigation in larger cohorts is required to assess the association of ASPECTS with acute ischemic stroke outcome.

Indexed as

AgedFemaleHumansIschemic StrokeMaleMiddle AgedNeuroimagingPatient SelectionPrognosisRetrospective StudiesTomography, X-Ray ComputedTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID33060102
PMCPMC7658843
OpenAlexW3092776161

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.