Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33060090›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2020

Experiences of breast feeding at work for physicians, residents and medical students: a scoping review.

Alexandra Frolkis, Allison Michaud, Khue-Tu Nguyen, Moss Bruton Joe, Kirstie Lithgow, Shannon M Ruzycki

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Return to work after parenting in thoracic surgery: a call to action.Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Alexandra FrolkisDepartment of Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Allison MichaudDepartment of Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Khue-Tu NguyenDepartment of Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Moss Bruton JoeCumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Kirstie LithgowDepartment of Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Shannon M RuzyckiDepartment of Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada shannon.ruzycki@ucalgary.ca.ORCID 0000-0002-8122-2910

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo review and summarise the available literature regarding breastfeeding experiences of medical students, residents and physicians. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Articles of any design, including non-peer reviewed data that examine the experiences of breast feeding of medical students, residents and staff physicians. INFORMATION SOURCES: Ovid MEDLINE(R) and Epub Ahead of Print, In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations and Daily, Ovid EMBASE, Scopus and Web of Science. RISK OF BIAS: All peer-reviewed studies underwent risk-of-bias assessment using relevant tools, depending on the study design. INCLUDED STUDIES: We included 71 citations; 51 surveys, 3 narrative descriptions, 9 editorials or letters to the editor, and 3 reviews. SYNTHESIS OF

resultsIncluded articles were heterogeneous with respect to their study design, target population and outcomes reported. Most articles had a high risk of bias. Only five articles reported the impact of an intervention. DESCRIPTION OF EFFECT: Despite heterogeneity, the majority of articles described important barriers to breast feeding for physicians, residents and medical students. These barriers were similar across studies, and included inadequate and inaccessible space, time constraints and inflexible scheduling, and lack of colleague support. The consequences of these barriers included low milk supply and early discontinuation of breast feeding. STRENGTHS AND LIMITATIONS OF EVIDENCE: Due to the observed heterogeneity of articles identified in this review, we are unable to assess trends in barriers or duration of breastfeeding over time.

interpretationInterventions to overcome systemic and cultural barriers to breast feeding are needed to meet legal obligations of workplaces for physicians and trainees. These interventions should be formally evaluated using implementation science or quality improvement methods.

Indexed as

Breast FeedingPhysiciansStudents, MedicalFemaleHumansQuality Improvementhealth policyhealth services administration & managementmedical education & training

Identifiers

PMID33060090
PMCPMC7566725

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.