Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33060088›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2020

Ghost ileostomy versus conventional loop ileostomy in patients undergoing low anterior resection for rectal cancer (DRKS00013997): protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

Felix J Hüttner, Pascal Probst, André Mihaljevic, Pietro Contin, Colette Dörr-Harim, Alexis Ulrich, Martin Schneider, Markus W Büchler, Markus K Diener, Phillip Knebel

3 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05985239 completednot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Comparing the Safety and Efficacy of Virtual Ileostomy Versus Diverting Ileostomy in Patients Underwent Total Mesorectal Excision for Rectal Cancer: a Propensity-matched Study

TypeobservationalSponsorfan liRan2023 to 2024Enrolled612ConditionsRectal CancerArmsVI, DI
NCT05985252 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Virtual Ileostomy Versus Conventional Loop Ileostomy in Patients Undergoing Low Anterior Resection for Rectal Cancer: A Randomized Controlled Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorDaping Hospital and the Research Institute of Surgery of the Third Military Medical UniversityRan2023 to 2025Enrolled500ConditionsRectal NeoplasmsArmsVirtual ileostomy, Diverting ileostomy
NCT06633133 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Comparing the Safety and Efficacy of Virtual Ileostomy Versus Diverting Ileostomy in Patients Undergoing Total Mesorectal Excision for Rectal Cancer: a Multicentre, Prospective, Open-label, Blinded Endpoint, PROBE Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorDaping Hospital and the Research Institute of Surgery of the Third Military Medical UniversityRan2024 to 2030Enrolled620ConditionsRectal CancerArmsVirtual ileostomy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Felix J HüttnerDepartment of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2299-964X
Pascal ProbstDepartment of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0895-4015
André MihaljevicDepartment of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Pietro ContinDepartment of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Colette Dörr-HarimDepartment of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Alexis UlrichSurgical Department I, Städtische Kliniken Neuss, Lukaskrankenhaus GmbH, Neuss, Germany.
Martin SchneiderDepartment of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Markus W BüchlerDepartment of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany markus.buechler@med.uni-heidelberg.de.
Markus K DienerDepartment of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Phillip KnebelDepartment of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Heidelberg University · DEGerman Society of Surgery · DELukaskrankenhaus · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAnastomotic leakage is the most important complication in colorectal surgery occurring in up to 20% after low anterior rectal resection. Therefore, a diverting ileostomy is usually created during low anterior resection to protect the anastomosis or rather to diminish the consequences in case of anastomotic leakage. The so-called virtual or ghost ileostomy is a pre-stage ostomy that can be easily exteriorised, if anastomotic leakage is suspected, in order to avoid the severe consequences of anastomotic leakage. On the other hand, an actual ileostomy can be avoided in patients, who do not develop anastomotic leakage. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The GHOST trial is a randomised controlled pilot trial comparing ghost ileostomy with conventional loop ileostomy in patients undergoing low anterior resection with total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. After screening for eligibility and obtaining informed consent, a total of 60 adult patients are included in the trial. Patients are intraoperatively randomised to the trial groups in a 1:1 ratio after assuring that none of the intraoperative exclusion criteria are present. The main outcome parameter is the comprehensive complication index as a measure of safety. Further outcomes include specific complications, stoma-related complications, complications of ileostomy closure, frequency of transformation of ghost ileostomy into conventional ileostomy, frequency of terminal ostomy creation, proportion of patients with an ostomy at 6 months after index surgery, anorectal function (Wexner score) and quality of life assessed by the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30 and CR29 questionnaires. Follow-up for each individual patient will be 6 months. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The GHOST trial has been approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of Heidelberg University (reference number S-694/2017). If the intervention proves to be safe, loop ileostomy could be spared in a large proportion of patients, thus also avoiding stoma-related complications and a second operation (ileostomy closure) with its inherent complications in these patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: German Clinical Trials Registry (DRKS00013997); Universal Trial Number: U1111-1208-9742.

Indexed as

IleostomyRectal NeoplasmsAdultAnastomosis, SurgicalAnastomotic LeakHumansPostoperative ComplicationsQuality of LifeRandomized Controlled Trials as Topiccolorectal surgerygastrointestinal tumours

Identifiers

PMID33060088
PMCPMC7566726
OpenAlexW3093276086

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.