ArticleThe International journal on drug policy2021
Enacting 'more-than-human' care: Clients' and counsellors' views on the multiple affordances of chatbots in alcohol and other drug counselling.
Article in The International journal on drug policy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 47 citations in OpenAlex.
- User and Provider Experiences With Health Education Chatbots: Qualitative Systematic Review.JMIR human factors · 2025Pooled it
- Examining the role of AI technology in online mental healthcare: opportunities, challenges, and implications, a mixed-methods review.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2024Pooled it
- Facilitators and Barriers to the Adoption of Telemedicine During the First Year of COVID-19: Systematic Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2022Pooled it
- How do Artificial Intelligence chatbots respond to questions from adolescent personas about their eating, body weight or appearance?Child and adolescent mental health · 2026Article
- Opportunities and risks of large language models in digital interventions for substance use disorders.Current opinion in psychiatry · 2026Review
- Development, Feasibility, Acceptability, and Usability of an Artificial Intelligence-Powered Chatbot (Suzy) to Support Patients in Substance Use Disorder Recovery: Multiphase Study.JMIR formative research · 2026Article
- Perspective on Using Artificial Intelligence in Alcohol Research and Treatment: Opportunities and Ethical Considerations.Alcohol research : current reviews · 2025Review
- Public Perception on Artificial Intelligence-Driven Mental Health Interventions: Survey Research.JMIR formative research · 2024Article
- Health Professionals' Views on the Use of Conversational Agents for Health Care: Qualitative Descriptive Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2024Article
- A systematic review of chatbot-assisted interventions for substance use.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2024Article
- Chatbots to Improve Sexual and Reproductive Health: Realist Synthesis.Journal of medical Internet research · 2023Review
- Exploring the Perceptions of mHealth Interventions for the Prevention of Common Mental Disorders in University Students in Singapore: Qualitative Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2023Article
- Usability and Credibility of a COVID-19 Vaccine Chatbot for Young Adults and Health Workers in the United States: Formative Mixed Methods Study.JMIR human factors · 2023Article
- Exploring the potential of delivering mental health care services using digital technologies in Bangladesh: A qualitative analysis.Internet interventions · 2022Article
- Using AI chatbots to provide self-help depression interventions for university students: A randomized trial of effectiveness.Internet interventions · 2022Article
- The conceptual potential of 'more-than-human care': A reflection with an artisanal fishing village in Brazil.Geo : geography and environmentArticle
- Beliefs, experiences and concerns of using artificial intelligence in healthcare: A qualitative synthesis.Digital healthReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Forms of artificial intelligence (AI), such as chatbots that provide automated online counselling, promise to revolutionise alcohol and other drug treatment. Although the replacement of human counsellors remains a speculative prospect, chatbots for 'narrow AI' tasks (e.g., assessment and referral) are increasingly being used to augment clinical practice. Little research has addressed the possibilities for care that chatbots may generate in the future, particularly in the context of alcohol and other drug counselling. To explore these issues, we draw on the concept of technological 'affordances' and identify the range of possibilities for care that emerging chatbot interventions may afford and foreclose depending on the contexts in which they are implemented. Our analysis is based on qualitative data from interviews with clients (n=20) and focus group discussions with counsellors (n=8) conducted as part of a larger study of an Australian online alcohol and other drug counselling service. Both clients and counsellors expressed a concern that chatbot interventions lacked a 'human' element, which they valued in empathic care encounters. Most clients reported that they would share less information with a chatbot than a human counsellor, and they viewed this as constraining care. However, clients and counsellors suggested that the use of narrow AI might afford possibilities for performing discrete tasks, such as screening, triage or referral. In the context of what we refer to as 'more-than-human' care, our findings reveal complex views about the types of affordances that chatbots may produce and foreclose in online care encounters. We conclude by discussing implications for the potential 'addiction futures' and care trajectories that AI technologies offer, focussing on how they might inform alcohol and other drug policy, and the design of digital healthcare.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.