Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33059815›Full record

ReviewZhongguo dang dai er ke za zhi = Chinese journal of contemporary pediatrics2020

[Application of RNA sequencing in clinical diagnosis of Mendelian disease].

Hui Xiao, Wen-Hao Zhou

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Zhongguo dang dai er ke za zhi = Chinese journal of contemporary pediatrics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Hui XiaoDepartment of Neonatology, Children's Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 201102, China. zhouwenhao@fudan.edu.cn.
Wen-Hao Zhou

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gene panel and whole exome sequencing are now commonly used to detect Mendelian disease, but the current molecular diagnostic rate of DNA sequencing is only 35%-50%. In recent years, RNA sequencing emerges as a promising diagnostic method. It can detect new pathogenic mutations, and analyze allele-specific expression. This will be helpful to understand the relationship between disease genotype and phenotype, and can complement genome sequencing in order to expand the traditional genomic diagnostic methods of Mendelian disease. RNA sequencing is expected to become a routine tool for diagnosing Mendelian diseases. This article reviews the application of RNA sequencing in the clinical diagnosis of Mendelian disease.

Indexed as

Sequence Analysis, RNABase SequenceExomeExome SequencingSequence Analysis, DNA

Identifiers

PMID33059815
PMCPMC7568994

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.