ArticleZhongguo dang dai er ke za zhi = Chinese journal of contemporary pediatrics2020
[A comparative analysis of the efficacy of two vitamin D supplementation regimens in preterm infants: a prospective randomized controlled study].
Article in Zhongguo dang dai er ke za zhi = Chinese journal of contemporary pediatrics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo study the effect of different vitamin D supplementation regimens on the nutritional status of vitamin D on day 28 after birth in preterm infants with a gestational age of <34 weeks.
methodsA total of 59 preterm infants with a gestational age of <34 weeks who were born from October 2018 to October 2019 were enrolled and divided into an observation group with 30 infants and a control group with 29 infants. The infants in the observation group received a single-dose intramuscular injection of vitamin D
resultsWithin 48 hours after birth, the prevalence rate of vitamin D deficiency (≤15 ng/mL) was 78% among the 59 preterm infants. There were no significant differences in the serum 25(OH)D level and the prevalence rate of vitamin D deficiency between the two groups (P>0.05). Compared with the control group on day 28 after birth, the observation group had a significantly higher serum 25(OH)D level (P<0.05) and a significantly lower prevalence rate of vitamin D deficiency (P<0.05). There were no cases of vitamin D overdose or poisoning.
conclusionsIn preterm infants with a gestational age of <34 weeks, single-dose intramuscular injection of 10 000 IU/kg vitamin D
Indexed as
Identifiers
33059801PMC7568995W3093212580What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.