Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33059785›Full record

ArticleParasitology2021

Altered neuronal activity in the visual processing region of eye-fluke-infected fish.

Anthony Stumbo, Robert Poulin, Brandon Ruehle

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Parasitology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Anthony StumboOtago Museum, 419 Great King St., Dunedin9016, New Zealand.
Robert PoulinDepartment of Zoology, University of Otago, 340 Great King St., Dunedin9016, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0003-1390-1206
Brandon RuehleDepartment of Zoology, University of Otago, 340 Great King St., Dunedin9016, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0002-9898-3169
University of Otago · NZOtago Polytechnic · NZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fish, like most vertebrates, are dependent on vision to varying degrees for a variety of behaviours such as predator avoidance and foraging. Disruption of this key sensory system therefore should have some impact on the ability of fish to execute these tasks. Eye-flukes, such as Tylodelphys darbyi, often infect fish where they are known to inflict varying degrees of visual impairment. In New Zealand, T. darbyi infects the eyes of Gobiomorphus cotidianus, a freshwater fish, where it resides in the vitreous chamber between the lens and retina. Here, we investigate whether the presence of the parasite in the eye has an impact on neuronal information transfer using the c-Fos gene as a proxy for neuron activation. We hypothesized that the parasite would reduce visual information entering the eye and therefore result in lower c-Fos expression. Interestingly, however, c-Fos expression increased with T. darbyi intensity when fish were exposed to flashes of light. Our results suggest a mechanism for parasite-induced visual disruption when no obvious pathology is caused by infection. The more T. darbyi present the more visual stimuli the fish is presented with, and as such may experience difficulties in distinguishing various features of its external environment.

Indexed as

AnimalsEyeEye InjuriesFish DiseasesFishesFresh WaterHost-Parasite InteractionsNeuronsNew ZealandProto-Oncogene Proteins c-fosTrematodaTrematode InfectionsVisual PerceptionProto-Oncogene Proteins c-fosDiplostomideye-flukefish parasitehost–parasite interactionneuronal activity

Identifiers

PMID33059785
PMCPMC11010201
OpenAlexW3093243203

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.