SynthesisImplementation science : IS2020
Strategies for effective dissemination of research to United States policymakers: a systematic review.
Synthesis in Implementation science : IS, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 66 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
66 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- The effectiveness of interventions to disseminate the results of non-commercial randomised clinical trials to healthcare professionals: a systematic review.Implementation science : IS · 2024Pooled it
- Barriers and facilitators to dissemination of non-communicable diseases research: a mixed studies systematic review.Frontiers in public health · 2024Pooled it
- Effectively communicating with local policymakers: a randomized trial of policy brief dissemination to address obesity.Frontiers in public health · 2024Trial
- SciComm Optimizer for Policy Engagement: a randomized controlled trial of the SCOPE model on state legislators' research use in public discourse.Implementation science : IS · 2023Trial
- Public support for policies to improve population and planetary health: A population-based online experiment assessing impact of communicating evidence of multiple versus single benefits.Social science & medicine (1982) · 2022Trial
- Strengthening School Safety Through Governmental Research-Practice Partnerships: the Arizona School Safety Program.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2026Article
- Considerations for Applied Behavior Analysts Embracing Intersectional Qualitative Research Within the Context of Intervention Research.Behavior analysis in practice · 2026Article
- Role of an Intermediary Organization and State Government Partnership to Advance Practice and Policy in Children's Behavioral Health.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2026Article
- Digital and traditional recruitment strategies and participation patterns in the multicenter Healthy Brain Ageing study.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Article
- Stinging Stigma in Healthcare Symposium: A Participatory Approach to Disseminating Research and Strengthening Community.Journal of participatory research methods · 2026Article
- One voice and vision: How the RISE network built a collective identity as the foundation for strategic dissemination.Harm reduction journal · 2025Article
- Uncovering drivers of climate research in policy with pretrained language models.Patterns (New York, N.Y.) · 2025Article
- Advancing equitable and sustainable urban health.Nature medicine · 2025Review
- Community-Academic Workshop on Translating Research Findings into Policy Briefs for Broader Dissemination.Ethnicity & disease · 2025Article
- Pediatric Applications of Digital Therapeutics: Clinical Evidence and Implementation Landscape.Cureus · 2025Review
- The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) User Guide: a five-step guide for conducting implementation research using the framework.Implementation science : IS · 2025Article
- Leveraging research for health insurance coverage of Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction: insights from policy makers, patients and practitioners.Evidence & policy : a journal of research, debate and practice · 2025Article
- The C-CAP Process: A Comprehensive Approach to Community Resource Mapping.Health promotion practice · 2025Article
- Operational and organizational variation in determinants of policy implementation success: the case of policies that earmark taxes for behavioral health services.Implementation science : IS · 2024Article
- An Assessment Model for Agricultural Databases: The Arthropod Pesticide Resistance Database as a Case Study.Insects · 2024Article
6 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundResearch has the potential to influence US social policy; however, existing research in this area lacks a coherent message. The Model for Dissemination of Research provides a framework through which to synthesize lessons learned from research to date on the process of translating research to US policymakers.
methodsThe peer-reviewed and grey literature was systematically reviewed to understand common strategies for disseminating social policy research to policymakers in the United States. We searched Academic Search Premier, PolicyFile, SocINDEX, Social Work Abstracts, and Web of Science from January 1980 through December 2019. Articles were independently reviewed and thematically analyzed by two investigators and organized using the Model for Dissemination of Research.
resultsThe search resulted in 5225 titles and abstracts for inclusion consideration. 303 full-text articles were reviewed with 27 meeting inclusion criteria. Common sources of research dissemination included government, academic researchers, the peer reviewed literature, and independent organizations. The most frequently disseminated research topics were health-related, and legislators and executive branch administrators were the most common target audience. Print materials and personal communication were the most common channels for disseminating research to policymakers. There was variation in dissemination channels by level of government (e.g., a more formal legislative process at the federal level compared with other levesl). Findings from this work suggest that dissemination is most effective when it starts early, galvanizes support, uses champions and brokers, considers contextual factors, is timely, relevant, and accessible, and knows the players and process.
conclusionsEffective dissemination of research to US policymakers exists; yet, rigorous quantitative evaluation is rare. A number of cross-cutting strategies appear to enhance the translation of research evidence into policy. REGISTRATION: Not registered.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.