ArticleBreast cancer research : BCR2020
Inter-tumor genomic heterogeneity of breast cancers: comprehensive genomic profile of primary early breast cancers and relapses.
Article in Breast cancer research : BCR, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
42 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 51 citations in OpenAlex.
- Discordance of PIK3CA mutational status between primary and metastatic breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Breast cancer research and treatment · 2023Pooled it
- Guideline
- LINC01929 promotes breast cancer progression through a TFRC-associated ferroptosis pathway.Cell death discovery · 2026Article
- Molecular profiling of breast cancer pleural effusions using cytology specimens: Impact of sample source and cytological features on next-generation sequencing performance.Cancer cytopathology · 2026Article
- Interpreting cancer genetics through a two-step "evolutionary cascade hypothesis": bridging neutral and selective perspectives.Journal of translational medicine · 2026Review
- Biomarker testing in advanced or metastatic hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 negative breast cancer: expert recommendations.Therapeutic advances in medical oncology · 2026Review
- Emerging role of low-frequency somatic mutations in cancer relapse: from early detection to precision oncology.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Identification of actionable targets using DEPArray-based sorting of pure carcinoma and stromal populations from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissues followed by shallow whole-genome sequencing.The Journal of pathology · 2026Article
- Article
- Spatial-temporal radiogenomics in predicting neoadjuvant chemotherapy efficacy for breast cancer: a comprehensive review.Journal of translational medicine · 2025Review
- Targeting MYC for the treatment of breast cancer: use of the novel MYC-GSPT1 degrader, GT19630.Investigational new drugs · 2025Article
- Clinical characteristics and therapeutic direction of HER2 low-expression breast cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Review
- Recent Advancements in Breast Cancer Therapies and Biomarkers: Mechanisms and Clinical Significance.Current pharmaceutical biotechnology · 2025Review
- A new insight into the impact of copy number variations on cell cycle deregulation of luminal-type breast cancer.Oncology reviews · 2025Review
- The amino acid transporter SLC7A11 expression in breast cancer.Cancer biology & therapy · 2024Article
- Unveiling the role of SYNGR4 in breast cancer development: a novel target for immunotherapy.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Article
- Monoclonal Antibodies and Antibody-drug Conjugates as Emerging Therapeutics for Breast Cancer Treatment.Current drug delivery · 2024Review
- GPR81-mediated reprogramming of glucose metabolism contributes to the immune landscape in breast cancer.Discover oncology · 2023Article
- Aspirin Affects MDA-MB-231 Vesicle Production and Their Capacity to Induce Fibroblasts towards a Pro-Invasive State.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Breast Cancer Statistics in Korea, 2019.Journal of breast cancer · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe breast cancer genome dynamically evolves during malignant progression and recurrence. We investigated the genomic profiles of primary early-stage breast cancers and matched relapses to elucidate the molecular underpinnings of the metastatic process, focusing on potentially actionable alterations in the recurrences.
methodsA mono-institutional cohort of 128 patients with breast cancers (n = 68 luminal B HER2, n = 6 luminal B HER2+, n = 1 HER2+ non-luminal, n = 56 triple negative) and at least one recurrence in a timeframe of 17 years was evaluated. Next-generation sequencing comprehensive genomic profiling was performed on 289 formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) samples, including primary tumors and matched relapses. Correlations of genomic aberrations with clinicopathologic factors and time to breast cancer relapse were analyzed.
resultsGenomic data were available for 188 of 289 FFPE samples that achieved the sequencing quality parameters (failure rate 34.9%), including 106 primary tumors and 82 relapses. All primary and relapse samples harbored at least one genomic alteration, with a median number of six alterations per sample (range 1-16). The most frequent somatic genomic alterations were mutations of TP53 (primary tumors = 49%, relapses = 49%) and PIK3CA (primary tumors = 33%, relapses = 30%). Distinctive genomic alterations of primary tumors were significantly associated with molecular subtypes. TP53, PIK3R1, and NF1 somatic alterations were more frequently detected in triple negative tumors (p value < 0.05); CCND1, FGF3, and FGFR1 copy number gains were recurrently identified in luminal cases (p value < 0.05). Moreover, TP53 mutations and MYC amplification were significantly and independently associated with a shorter time to relapse (p value < 0.05). Molecular subtype changes between primary tumors and relapses were seen in 10 of 128 (7.8%) cases. Most driver genomic alterations (55.8%) were shared between primary tumors and matched recurrences. However, in 39 of 61 cases (63.9%), additional private alterations were detected in the relapse samples only, including 12 patients with potentially actionable aberrations.
conclusionsSpecific genomic aberrations of primary breast cancers were associated with time to relapse. Primary tumors and matched recurrences showed a core of shared driver genomic aberrations but private actionable alterations have been identified in the relapses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.