Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33059705›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2020

Health care utilisation among older people with Down syndrome compared to specific medical guidelines for health surveillance: a Swedish national register study.

G Ahlström, A Axmon, M Sandberg, E Flygare Wallén

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. A Wide Range of Eye Diseases.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

G AhlströmDepartment of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, Box 157, 221 00, Huddinge, Sweden. gerd.ahlstrom@med.lu.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6230-7583
A AxmonEPI@LUND (Epidemiology, Population studies, and Infrastructures at Lund University), Lund University, 221 00, Stockholm, Sweden.
M SandbergDepartment of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, Box 157, 221 00, Huddinge, Sweden.
E Flygare WallénDepartment of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society (NVS), H1 Division of Family Medicine and Primary Care, Karolinska Institutet (KI), Alfred Nobels allé 10, 141 83, Huddinge, Sweden.
Lund University · SEKarolinska Institutet · SE

Funding

Forskningsrådet om Hälsa, Arbetsliv och Välfärd 2014-4753
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSpecific medical guidelines for health surveillance exist for people with Down syndrome (DS) since 25 years but knowledge of adherence to the guidelines is lacking. The guidelines were developed to avoid unnecessary suffering from preventable conditions. The aims of the study were to investigate 1) planned health care visits in relation to the co-morbidities described in specific medical guidelines as a measure of adherence, 2) unplanned health care visits as a measure of potentially unmet health care needs and 3) gender differences in health care utilisation among older people with DS.

methodsThis register-based study includes people with DS (n = 472) from a Swedish national cohort of people with intellectual disability (n = 7936), aged 55 years or more, and with at least one support according to the disability law, in 2012. Data on inpatient and outpatient specialist health care utilisation were collected from the National Patient Register for 2002-2012.

resultsA total of 3854 inpatient and outpatient specialist health care visits were recorded during the 11 years, of which 54.6% (n = 2103) were planned, 44.0% (n = 1695) unplanned and 1.4% (n = 56) lacked information. More than half of the visits, 67.0% (n = 2582) were outpatient health care thus inpatient 33% (n = 1272). Most planned visits (29.4%, n = 618) were to an ophthalmology clinic, and most unplanned visits to an internal medicine clinic (36.6%, n = 621). The most common cause for planned visits was cataract, found at least once for 32.8% in this cohort, followed by arthrosis (8.9%), epilepsy (8.9%) and dementia (6.6%). Pneumonia, pain, fractures and epilepsy each accounted for at least one unplanned visit for approximately one-fourth of the population (27.1, 26.9, 26.3 and 19.7% respectively). Men and women had similar numbers of unplanned visits. However, women were more likely to have visits for epilepsy or fractures, and men more likely for pneumonia.

conclusionsIncreased awareness of existing specific medical guidelines for people with DS is vital for preventive measures. The relatively few planned health care visits according to the medical guidelines together with a high number of unplanned visits caused by conditions which potentially can be prevented suggest a need of improved adherence to medical guidelines.

Indexed as

AgedCohort StudiesDown SyndromeFemaleGuideline AdherenceHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient Acceptance of Health CarePractice Guidelines as TopicRegistriesSwedenAgedComorbidityDown syndromeGuideline adherenceInpatientsIntellectual disabilityMental retardationOutpatient careSpecialist health care

Identifiers

PMID33059705
PMCPMC7559468
OpenAlexW3093083656

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.