Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33059698›Full record

ReviewMolecular neurodegeneration2020

Neurofilaments in motor neuron disorders: towards promising diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers.

Elisabetta Zucchi, Valentina Bonetto, Gianni Sorarù, Ilaria Martinelli, Piero Parchi, Rocco Liguori, Jessica Mandrioli

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Molecular neurodegeneration, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 72 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
72citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

72 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 97 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Antibody targeting TDP-43 mitigates pathogenic pathways induced by the cerebrospinal fluid of ALS.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

12 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Elisabetta ZucchiDepartment of Biomedical, Metabolic and Neural Science, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy.
Valentina BonettoDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Pharmacology, Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
Gianni SorarùNeuromuscular Center, Department of Neurosciences, University of Padova, Padua, Italy.
Ilaria MartinelliDepartment of Neurosciences, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Modena, Modena, Italy.
Piero ParchiIRCCS Istituto delle Scienze Neurologiche, Ospedale Bellaria, Bologna, Italy.
Rocco LiguoriIRCCS Istituto delle Scienze Neurologiche, Ospedale Bellaria, Bologna, Italy.
Jessica MandrioliDepartment of Neurosciences, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Modena, Modena, Italy. mandrioli.jessica@aou.mo.it.ORCID 0000-0002-9244-9782
Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Modena · ITOspedale Bellaria · ITMario Negri Institute for Pharmacological Research · ITUniversity of Modena and Reggio Emilia · ITUniversity of Padua · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Motor neuron diseases (MNDs) are etiologically and biologically heterogeneous diseases. The pathobiology of motor neuron degeneration is still largely unknown, and no effective therapy is available. Heterogeneity and lack of specific disease biomarkers have been appointed as leading reasons for past clinical trial failure, and biomarker discovery is pivotal in today's MND research agenda.In the last decade, neurofilaments (NFs) have emerged as promising biomarkers for the clinical assessment of neurodegeneration. NFs are scaffolding proteins with predominant structural functions contributing to the axonal cytoskeleton of myelinated axons. NFs are released in CSF and peripheral blood as a consequence of axonal degeneration, irrespective of the primary causal event. Due to the current availability of highly-sensitive automated technologies capable of precisely quantify proteins in biofluids in the femtomolar range, it is now possible to reliably measure NFs not only in CSF but also in blood.In this review, we will discuss how NFs are impacting research and clinical management in ALS and other MNDs. Besides contributing to the diagnosis at early stages by differentiating between MNDs with different clinical evolution and severity, NFs may provide a useful tool for the early enrolment of patients in clinical trials. Due to their stability across the disease, NFs convey prognostic information and, on a larger scale, help to stratify patients in homogenous groups. Shortcomings of NFs assessment in biofluids will also be discussed according to the available literature in the attempt to predict the most appropriate use of the biomarker in the MND clinic.

Indexed as

Intermediate FilamentsMotor Neuron DiseaseAnimalsBiomarkersHumansPrognosisBiomarkersAmyotrophic lateral sclerosisBiomarkersDiagnosticDisease-progressionMotor neuron disorderNeurofilamentPrognosticSensitivity

Identifiers

PMID33059698
PMCPMC7559190
OpenAlexW3092763346

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.