Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33059688›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2020

The experience of health and welfare workers in identifying and responding to domestic abuse among military personnel in the UK.

Katherine Sparrow, Filipa Alves-Costa, Ana Alves, Neil Greenberg, Louise M Howard, Nicola T Fear, Deirdre MacManus

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Katherine SparrowForensic and Neurodevelopmental Science Department, King's College London, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, 16 De Crespigny Park, London, SE5 8AF, UK.
Filipa Alves-CostaForensic and Neurodevelopmental Science Department, King's College London, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, 16 De Crespigny Park, London, SE5 8AF, UK. filipa.alves-costa@kcl.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5235-3703
Ana AlvesBarnet Enfield and Haringey Mental Health NHS Trust, London, UK.
Neil GreenbergKing's Centre for Military Health Research (KCMHR) Academic Department of Military Mental Health (ADMMH), King's College London, London, UK.
Louise M HowardSection of Women's Mental Health, King's College London, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, London, UK.
Nicola T FearKing's Centre for Military Health Research (KCMHR) Academic Department of Military Mental Health (ADMMH), King's College London, London, UK.
Deirdre MacManusForensic and Neurodevelopmental Science Department, King's College London, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, 16 De Crespigny Park, London, SE5 8AF, UK.
King's College London · GBBarnet Enfield and Haringey Mental Health Trust · GB

Funding

Department of Health PDF-2015-08-113
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAwareness of domestic violence and abuse (DVA) as a problem among military personnel (serving and veterans) has grown in recent years, and there is a need for research to inform improvements in the identification of and response to DVA in this population. This study aimed to explore the experience of health and welfare professionals in identifying and responding to DVA among the UK military population (serving personnel and veterans).

methodsThirty-five semi-structured telephone interviews were conducted with health and welfare staff who work with serving UK military personnel and veterans. Interviews were analysed using thematic analysis.

resultsThree superordinate themes were identified: i) patterns of DVA observed by health and welfare workers (perceived gender differences in DVA experiences and role of mental health and alcohol); (ii) barriers to identification of and response to DVA (attitudinal/knowledge-based barriers and practical barriers), and iii) resource issues (training needs and access to services). Participants discussed how factors such as a culture of hypermasculinity, under-reporting of DVA, the perception of DVA as a "private matter" among military personnel, and lack of knowledge and awareness of emotional abuse and coercive controlling behaviour as abuse constitute barriers to identification and management of DVA. Healthcare providers highlighted the need for more integrated working between civilian and military services, to increase access to support and provide effective care to both victims and perpetrators. Furthermore, healthcare and welfare staff reflected on their training needs in the screening and management of DVA to improve practice.

conclusionsThere is a need for increased awareness of DVA, particularly of non-physical forms of abuse, and of male victimisation in the military. Standardised protocols for DVA management and systematic training are required to promote a consistent and appropriate response to DVA. There is a particular training need among healthcare and first-line welfare staff, who are largely relied upon to identify cases of DVA in the military. Employing DVA advocates within military and civilian healthcare settings may be useful in improving DVA awareness, management and access to specialist support.

Indexed as

Military PersonnelAdultDomestic ViolenceFemaleHealth PersonnelHumansMaleQualitative ResearchSocial WorkersUnited KingdomVeteransDomestic abuseHealthcare servicesIntimate partner violenceMilitarySupport servicesVeteransWelfare services

Identifiers

PMID33059688
PMCPMC7559780
OpenAlexW3093089326

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.