Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33059632›Full record

ArticleBMC palliative care2020

Optimizing of a question prompt list to improve communication about the heart failure trajectory in patients, families, and health care professionals.

Lisa Hjelmfors, Martje H L van der Wal, Maria Friedrichsen, Anna Milberg, Jan Mårtensson, Anna Sandgren, Anna Strömberg, Tiny Jaarsma

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC palliative care, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Lisa HjelmforsDepartment of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Division of Nursing Sciences and Reproductive Health, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden. lisa.hjelmfors@liu.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9931-9924
Martje H L van der WalDepartment of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Maria FriedrichsenPalliative Education & Research Centre, Vrinnevi hospital, Norrköping, Sweden.
Anna MilbergDepartment of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Division of Prevention, Rehabilitation and Community Medicine, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Jan MårtenssonDepartment of Nursing, School of Health and Welfare, Jönköping University, Jönköping, Sweden.
Anna SandgrenCenter for Collaborative Palliative Care, Department of Health and Caring Sciences, Linnaeus University, Växjö, Sweden.
Anna StrömbergDepartment of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences and Department of Cardiology, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Tiny JaarsmaDepartment of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Division of Nursing Sciences and Reproductive Health, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.

Funding

Forskningsrådet i Sydöstra Sverige 753711Research and scholarship management in Region Östergötland 756931
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe aim of this study was to optimize a Question Prompt List which is designed to improve communication about the heart failure trajectory among patients, family members, and health care professionals.

methodsData were collected in a two-round Delphi survey and a cross-sectional survey, including patients with heart failure, their family members, and health care professionals working in heart failure care in Sweden and the Netherlands. Acceptability for and demand of the Question Prompt List were assessed.

resultsA total of 96 patients, 63 family members and 26 health care professionals participated in the study. Regarding acceptability, most of the original questions were found to be relevant by the participants for inclusion in the Question Prompt List but some cultural differences exist, which resulted in two versions of the list: a Swedish version including 33 questions and a Dutch version including 38 questions. Concerning demand, participants reported that they were interested in discussing the questions in the revised Question Prompt List with a physician or a nurse. Few patients and family members reported that they were worried by the questions in the Question Prompt List and hence did not want to discuss the questions.

conclusionsThis Question Prompt List has successfully been adapted into a Swedish version and a Dutch version and includes questions about the HF trajectory which patients, their families, and health care professionals perceived to be relevant for discussion in clinical practice. Overall, patients and family members were not worried about the content in the Question Prompt List and if used in accordance with patients' and family members' preferences, the Question Prompt List can help to improve communication about the heart failure trajectory.

Indexed as

CommunicationProfessional-Patient RelationsActivities of Daily LivingAdultAgedCross-Sectional StudiesDelphi TechniqueFamilyFemaleHeart FailureHumansMaleNetherlandsSurveys and QuestionnairesSwedenTerminal CareCommunicationEnd-of-life careHeart failureIllness trajectoryQuestion prompt list

Identifiers

PMID33059632
PMCPMC7566035

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.