Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33059625›Full record

Observational studyBMC pregnancy and childbirth2020

Preeclampsia knowledge among postpartum women treated for preeclampsia and eclampsia at Korle Bu Teaching Hospital in Accra, Ghana.

Avina Joshi, Titus Beyuo, Samuel A Oppong, Cheryl A Moyer, Emma R Lawrence

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Avina JoshiUniversity of Massachusetts Medical School, 55 N. Lake Ave, Worcester, MA, 01655, USA.
Titus BeyuoUniversity of Ghana School of Medicine and Dentistry, Slater Avenue, Accra, Ghana. drbeyuo@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3706-4695
Samuel A OppongUniversity of Ghana School of Medicine and Dentistry, Slater Avenue, Accra, Ghana.
Cheryl A MoyerGlobal REACH, University of Michigan Medical School, 1301 Catherine St, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA.
Emma R LawrenceDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Michigan Medical School, 1500 E. Medical Center Dr, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA.
University of Ghana · GHUniversity of Michigan · USUniversity of Massachusetts Chan Medical School · US

Funding

NPGH LEADERs YR12: OBSSR (Greenberg, Ngwafong Mukere) & NIBIB (Lee)D43TW009345 · FIC · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI Dibyadyuti Datta, Chandy C. John · 2017 to 2026
$15.2M
FIC NIH HHS D43 TW009345FIC NIH HHS D43TW009345
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPreeclampsia/eclampsia is a major cause of maternal morbidity and mortality worldwide, yet patients' perspectives about their diagnosis are not well understood. Our study examines patient knowledge among women with preeclampsia/eclampsia in a large urban hospital in Ghana.

methodsPostpartum women diagnosed with preeclampsia or eclampsia were asked to complete a survey 2-5 days after delivery that assessed demographic information, key obstetric factors, and questions regarding provider counseling. Provider counseling on diagnosis, causes, complications, and future health effects of preeclampsia/eclampsia was quantified on a 4-point scale ('Counseling Composite Score'). Participants also completed an objective knowledge assessment regarding preeclampsia/eclampsia, scored from 0 to 22 points ('Preeclampsia/Eclampsia Knowledge Score' (PEKS)). Linear regression was used to identify predictors of knowledge score.

resultsA total of 150 participants were recruited, 88.7% (133) with preeclampsia and 11.3% (17) with eclampsia. Participants had a median age of 32 years, median parity of 2, and mean number of 5.4 antenatal visits. Approximately half of participants reported primary education as their highest level of education. While 74% of women reported having a complication during pregnancy, only 32% of participants with preeclampsia were able to correctly identify their diagnosis, and no participants diagnosed with eclampsia could correctly identify their diagnosis. Thirty-one percent of participants reported receiving no counseling from providers, and only 11% received counseling in all four categories. Even when counseled, 40-50% of participants reported incomplete understanding. Out of 22 possible points on a cumulative knowledge assessment scale, participants had a mean score of 12.9 ± 0.38. Adjusting for age, parity, and the number of antenatal visits, higher scores on the knowledge assessment are associated with more provider counseling (β 1.4, SE 0.3, p < 0.001) and higher level of education (β 1.3, SE 0.48, p = 0.008).

conclusionsCounseling by healthcare providers is associated with higher performance on a knowledge assessment about preeclampsia/eclampsia. Patient knowledge about preeclampsia/eclampsia is important for efforts to encourage informed healthcare decisions, promote early antenatal care, and improve self-recognition of warning signs-ultimately improving morbidity and reducing mortality.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeAdolescentAdultCounselingEclampsiaFemaleGhanaHospitals, TeachingHospitals, UrbanHumansMaternal MortalityMiddle AgedPostpartum PeriodPre-EclampsiaPregnancyPrenatal CareEclampsiaMaternal healthPatient educationPatient knowledgePreeclampsiaPregnancyProvider counselingSub-Saharan Africa

Identifiers

PMID33059625
PMCPMC7566025
OpenAlexW3092947344

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.