Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33059604›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2020

Detection of MCM5 as a novel non-invasive aid for the diagnosis of endometrial and ovarian tumours.

J Stockley, R Akhand, A Kennedy, C Nyberg, E J Crosbie, R J Edmondson

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05287048 (A Performance Evaluation Study of Arquer Diagnostics Ltd's MCM5 ELISA), which is not on this map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05287048 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

A Performance Evaluation Study of Arquer Diagnostics Ltd's MCM5 ELISA (ADXGYNAE) Test to Aid in the Diagnosis of Endometrial Cancer

TypeobservationalSponsorArquer Diagnostics LtdRan2022 to 2023Enrolled2,000ConditionsEndometrial CancerArmsMCM5 ELISA
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

J StockleyArquer Diagnostics Ltd, North East Business and Innovation Centre, Wearfield, Sunderland, SR5 2TA, UK.
R AkhandDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Saint Mary's Hospital, Central Manchester NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Level 5, Research Floor, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9WL, UK.
A KennedyArquer Diagnostics Ltd, North East Business and Innovation Centre, Wearfield, Sunderland, SR5 2TA, UK.
C NybergArquer Diagnostics Ltd, North East Business and Innovation Centre, Wearfield, Sunderland, SR5 2TA, UK.
E J CrosbieDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Saint Mary's Hospital, Central Manchester NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Level 5, Research Floor, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9WL, UK.
R J EdmondsonDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Saint Mary's Hospital, Central Manchester NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Level 5, Research Floor, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9WL, UK. richard.edmondson@manchester.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2553-4423
Manchester Academic Health Science Centre · GB

Funding

Arquer Diagnostics Ltd n/a
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMCM5 is a protein involved in DNA replication, facilitating cell proliferation. In normal epithelium MCM5 expression is restricted to the cells in the basal proliferative compartments, however in the presence of a tumour MCM5 positive cells are present at the surface epithelium and are shed into bodily fluids. The aim of this study was to determine the sensitivity of MCM5 as a biomarker for the detection of endometrial and ovarian cancer.

methodsPatients with known ovarian or endometrial cancers, or known benign gynaecological conditions, were enrolled. Informed consent was obtained prior to the collection of full void urine, and either a vaginal tampon (worn for 6-8 h), or a vaginal swab. Vaginal secretions were extracted from the tampon or swab, centrifuged and lysed. Urine samples were centrifuged and lysed. MCM5 levels were determined by MCM5-ELISA (Arquer Diagnostics Ltd).

results125 patients completed the study protocol, 41 patients had endometrial cancer, 26 ovarian cancer, and 58 benign controls. All patients provided a urine sample and either a tampon or vaginal swab sample. Urine MCM5 levels were higher in cancer patients than controls (p < 0.0001), there was no significant difference in levels between tampon samples or vaginal swab samples in cancer patients when compared to controls. Performance of MCM5 to discriminate cancer from benign disease was high with an area under the ROC curve of 0.83 for endometrial cancer and 0.68 for ovarian cancer. Using a cut off of 12 pg/mL, overall sensitivity for endometrial cancer was 87.8, and 61.5% for ovarian cancer with a specificity of 75.9%.

conclusionsMCM5 is a novel sensitive and specific biomarker for the detection of ovarian and endometrial tumours in urine samples, which is likely to have clinical utility as a diagnostic aid.

Indexed as

AgedBiomarkers, TumorCell Cycle ProteinsEarly Detection of CancerEndometrial NeoplasmsFemaleHumansMiddle AgedOvarian NeoplasmsBiomarkers, TumorCell Cycle ProteinsMCM5 protein, humanBiomarkerEarly detectionEndometrial cancerMCM5Ovarian cancer

Identifiers

PMID33059604
PMCPMC7559715
OpenAlexW3093053107

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.