Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33059075›Full record

ReviewDrug discovery today2021

Deep learning in next-generation sequencing.

Bertil Schmidt, Andreas Hildebrandt

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Drug discovery today, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Hematopathology Practice in the Digital Era: What has Changed?International journal of laboratory hematology · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Artificial Intelligence and Chromothripsis.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Bertil SchmidtInstitut für Informatik, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Germany. Electronic address: bertil.schmidt@uni-mainz.de.
Andreas HildebrandtInstitut für Informatik, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Germany. Electronic address: andreas.hildebrandt@uni-mainz.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Next-generation sequencing (NGS) methods lie at the heart of large parts of biological and medical research. Their fundamental importance has created a continuously increasing demand for processing and analysis methods of the data sets produced, addressing questions such as variant calling, metagenomic classification and quantification, genomic feature detection, or downstream analysis in larger biological or medical contexts. In addition to classical algorithmic approaches, machine-learning (ML) techniques are often used for such tasks. In particular, deep learning (DL) methods that use multilayered artificial neural networks (ANNs) for supervised, semisupervised, and unsupervised learning have gained significant traction for such applications. Here, we highlight important network architectures, application areas, and DL frameworks in a NGS context.

Indexed as

Deep LearningMetagenomicsNeural Networks, ComputerBiomedical ResearchHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumans

Identifiers

PMID33059075
PMCPMC7550123

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.