Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33059053›Full record

ReviewNeuroImage2021

Movies and narratives as naturalistic stimuli in neuroimaging.

Iiro P Jääskeläinen, Mikko Sams, Enrico Glerean, Jyrki Ahveninen

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in NeuroImage, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 82 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
82citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

82 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Functional neurological disorder, suggestion and virtual reality: neuroanatomical and computational perspectives.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Rethinking Naturalistic Movie Neuroimaging Through Film Form.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Awake Infants: Insights From More Than 750 Scanning Sessions.Infancy : the official journal of the International Society on Infant Studies · 2026
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

22 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Iiro P JääskeläinenBrain and Mind Laboratory, Department of Neuroscience and Biomedical Engineering, Aalto University School of Science, Espoo, Finland; International Laboratory of Social Neurobiology, Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, National Research University Higher School of Economics, Moscow, Russian Federation.
Mikko SamsBrain and Mind Laboratory, Department of Neuroscience and Biomedical Engineering, Aalto University School of Science, Espoo, Finland; Department of Computer Science, Aalto University School of Science, Espoo, Finland.
Enrico GlereanBrain and Mind Laboratory, Department of Neuroscience and Biomedical Engineering, Aalto University School of Science, Espoo, Finland; International Laboratory of Social Neurobiology, Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, National Research University Higher School of Economics, Moscow, Russian Federation.
Jyrki AhveninenMassachusetts General Hospital - Massachusetts Institute of Technology - Harvard Medical School Ahtinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Charlestown, MA, United States.

Funding

Mapping the intrinsic functional organization of auditory cortex in individual subjects using 7T MRIR01DC017991 · NIDCD · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI AHVENINEN, JYRKI · 2019 to 2023
$4.0M
Decoding parametric attributes of auditory working memories from human brain activityR01DC016915 · NIDCD · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI AHVENINEN, JYRKI · 2018 to 2022
$3.0M
Non-invasive measures of multisensory cortical feedforward and feedback influencesR01DC016765 · NIDCD · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI AHLFORS, SEPPO PENTTI, AHVENINEN, JYRKI · 2018 to 2022
$2.7M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC016765NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC016915NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC017991
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Using movies and narratives as naturalistic stimuli in human neuroimaging studies has yielded significant advances in understanding of cognitive and emotional functions. The relevant literature was reviewed, with emphasis on how the use of naturalistic stimuli has helped advance scientific understanding of human memory, attention, language, emotions, and social cognition in ways that would have been difficult otherwise. These advances include discovering a cortical hierarchy of temporal receptive windows, which supports processing of dynamic information that accumulates over several time scales, such as immediate reactions vs. slowly emerging patterns in social interactions. Naturalistic stimuli have also helped elucidate how the hippocampus supports segmentation and memorization of events in day-to-day life and have afforded insights into attentional brain mechanisms underlying our ability to adopt specific perspectives during natural viewing. Further, neuroimaging studies with naturalistic stimuli have revealed the role of the default-mode network in narrative-processing and in social cognition. Finally, by robustly eliciting genuine emotions, these stimuli have helped elucidate the brain basis of both basic and social emotions apparently manifested as highly overlapping yet distinguishable patterns of brain activity.

Indexed as

AttentionEmotionsLanguageMemoryMotion PicturesNarrationSocial CognitionBrainBrain MappingElectroencephalographyFunctional NeuroimagingHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingNeural PathwaysAttentionEmotionLanguageMemoryNaturalistic stimuliSocial cognition

Identifiers

PMID33059053
PMCPMC7805386

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.