Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33058527›Full record

ReviewJournal of separation science2021

Recent applications of retention modelling in liquid chromatography.

Mimi J den Uijl, Peter J Schoenmakers, Bob W J Pirok, Maarten R van Bommel

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of separation science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mimi J den UijlAnalytical Chemistry Group, van 't Hoff Institute for Molecular Sciences, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8440-0639
Peter J SchoenmakersAnalytical Chemistry Group, van 't Hoff Institute for Molecular Sciences, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Bob W J PirokAnalytical Chemistry Group, van 't Hoff Institute for Molecular Sciences, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4558-3778
Maarten R van BommelAnalytical Chemistry Group, van 't Hoff Institute for Molecular Sciences, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Funding

Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research 15506
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent applications of retention modelling in liquid chromatography (2015-2020) are comprehensively reviewed. The fundamentals of the field, which date back much longer, are summarized. Retention modeling is used in retention-mechanism studies, for determining physical parameters, such as lipophilicity, and for various more-practical purposes, including method development and optimization, method transfer, and stationary-phase characterization and comparison. The review focusses on the effects of mobile-phase composition on retention, but other variables and novel models to describe their effects are also considered. The five most-common models are addressed in detail, i.e. the log-linear (linear-solvent-strength) model, the quadratic model, the log-log (adsorption) model, the mixed-mode model, and the Neue-Kuss model. Isocratic and gradient-elution methods are considered for determining model parameters and the evaluation and validation of fitted models is discussed. Strategies in which retention models are applied for developing and optimizing one- and two-dimensional liquid chromatographic separations are discussed. The review culminates in some overall conclusions and several concrete recommendations.

Indexed as

lipophilicity determinationmethod optimizationmethod transferretention mechanismsstationary-phase characterization

Identifiers

PMID33058527
PMCPMC7821232

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.