Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33058349›Full record

ReviewBrain pathology (Zurich, Switzerland)2020

The use and limitations of single-cell mass cytometry for studying human microglia function.

Camila Fernández-Zapata, Julia K H Leman, Josef Priller, Chotima Böttcher

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Brain pathology (Zurich, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Unraveling the enigma: housekeeping geneFrontiers in psychiatry · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Microglia and metastases to the central nervous system: victim, ravager, or something else?Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR · 2022
    Review
  11. Glioma Stem Cells: Novel Data Obtained by Single-Cell Sequencing.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Immune-Triggered Forms of Plasticity Across Brain Regions.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2022
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. The myeloid side of the CNS.Brain pathology (Zurich, Switzerland) · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Camila Fernández-ZapataDepartment of Neuropsychiatry and Laboratory of Molecular Psychiatry, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4795-6053
Julia K H LemanDepartment of Neuropsychiatry and Laboratory of Molecular Psychiatry, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Josef PrillerDepartment of Neuropsychiatry and Laboratory of Molecular Psychiatry, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7596-0979
Chotima BöttcherDepartment of Neuropsychiatry and Laboratory of Molecular Psychiatry, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6226-586X
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DEGerman Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases · DE

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft SFB TRR 167-B05Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft SFB TRR 167-B07Medical Research Council MC_PC_16031
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microglia, the resident innate immune cells of the central nervous system (CNS), play an important role in brain development and homoeostasis, as well as in neuroinflammatory, neurodegenerative and psychiatric diseases. Studies in animal models have been used to determine the origin and development of microglia, and how these cells alter their transcriptional and phenotypic signatures during CNS pathology. However, little is known about their human counterparts. Recent studies in human brain samples have harnessed the power of multiplexed single-cell technologies such as single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) and mass cytometry (cytometry by time-of-flight [CyTOF]) to provide a comprehensive molecular view of human microglia in healthy and diseased brains. CyTOF is a powerful tool to study high-dimensional protein expression of human microglia (huMG) at the single-cell level. This technology widens the possibilities of high-throughput quantification (of over 60 targeted molecules) at a single-cell resolution. CyTOF can be combined with scRNA-seq for comprehensive analysis, as it allows single-cell analysis of post-translational modifications of proteins, which provides insights into cell signalling dynamics in targeted cells. In addition, imaging mass cytometry (IMC) has recently become commercially available, and will be useful for analysing multiple cell types in human brain sections. IMC leverages mass spectrometry to acquire spatial data of cell-cell interactions on tissue sections, using (theoretically) over 40 markers at the same time. In this review, we summarise recent studies of huMG using CyTOF and IMC analyses. The uses and limitations as well as future directions of these technologies are discussed.

Indexed as

Flow CytometrySingle-Cell AnalysisHumansMicrogliadepressionhuman microgliaimaging mass cytometrymass cytometrymicroglia functionmultiple sclerosis

Identifiers

PMID33058349
PMCPMC8018011
OpenAlexW3093470024

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.