Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33058237›Full record

Observational studyBritish journal of haematology2021

Infections in patients with lymphoproliferative diseases treated with targeted agents: SEIFEM multicentric retrospective study.

Gessica Marchesini, Gianpaolo Nadali, Davide Facchinelli, Anna Candoni, Chiara Cattaneo, Luca Laurenti, Rosa Fanci, Francesca Farina, Federica Lessi, Andrea Visentin and 11 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in British journal of haematology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. COVID-19 associated mold infections: Review of COVID-19 associated pulmonary aspergillosis and mucormycosis.Journal of microbiology, immunology, and infection = Wei mian yu gan ran za zhi · 2023
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. The Pathogenesis and Diagnosis ofJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors at 14 institutions in 2 countries.

Gessica MarchesiniHematology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata di Verona, Verona, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5501-9620
Gianpaolo NadaliHematology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata di Verona, Verona, Italy.
Davide FacchinelliHematology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata di Verona, Verona, Italy.
Anna CandoniDivision of Hematology and Stem Cell Transplantation, University Hospital of Udine, Udine, Italy.
Chiara CattaneoHematology Unit, Spedali Civili di Brescia, Brescia, Italy.
Luca LaurentiInstitute of Hematology, Fondazione Policlinico A. Gemelli - IRCCS -Università Cattolica S. Cuore, Roma, Italy.
Rosa FanciHaematology Unit, Careggi Hospital and University of Firenze, Italy.
Francesca FarinaDivision of Hematology and Stem Cell Transplantation, IRCCS San Raffaele, Milano, Italy.
Federica LessiDivision of Hematology and Clinical Immunology, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.
Andrea VisentinDivision of Hematology and Clinical Immunology, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-0271-7200
Francesco MarchesiHematology and Stem Cell Transplantation Unit, Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Roma, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-6353-2272
Lucia PreziosoHematology and BMT Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Parma, Parma, Italy.
Angelica SpolzinoHematology and BMT Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Parma, Parma, Italy.
Maria Chiara TisiDivision of Hematology, San Bortolo Hospital, Vicenza, Italy.
Fabio TrastulliDepartment of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Federico II University Medical School, Napoli, Italy.
Marika PicardiInstitute of Hematology, Fondazione Policlinico A. Gemelli - IRCCS -Università Cattolica S. Cuore, Roma, Italy.
Luisa VergaHematology and CTA ASST Monza, Milano Bicocca University, Ospedale San Gerardo, Monza, Italy.
Michelina DargenioHematology and Stem Cell Transplantation Unit, Vito Fazzi' Hospital, Lecce, Italy.
Alessandro BuscaSSD Division of Hematology and Stem Cell Transplantation, A.O.U. Citta' della Salute, Torino, Italy.
Livio PaganoInstitute of Hematology, Fondazione Policlinico A. Gemelli - IRCCS -Università Cattolica S. Cuore, Roma, Italy.
for Sorveglianza Epidemiologica Infezioni nelle Emopatie (SEIFEM)
Agostino Gemelli University Polyclinic · ITAzienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona · ITOspedale di Parma · ITUniversity of Padua · ITAzienda Ospedaliera Citta' della Salute e della Scienza di Torino · ITAzienda Ospedaliera San Gerardo · ITAzienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi · ITAzienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale degli Spedali Civili di Brescia · ITFederico II University Hospital · ITNational Cancer Institute · MYOspedale San Bortolo · ITOspedale Vito Fazzi · ITUniversity of Udine · ITVita-Salute San Raffaele University · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We describe the opportunistic infections occurring in 362 patients with lymphoproliferative disorders treated with ibrutinib and idelalisib in clinical practice. Overall, 108 of 362 patients (29·8%) developed infections, for a total of 152 events. Clinically defined infections (CDI) were 49·3% (75/152) and microbiologically defined infections (MDI) were 50·7% (77/152). Among 250 patients treated with ibrutinib, 28·8% (72/250) experienced one or more infections, for a total of 104 episodes. MDI were 49% (51/104). Bacterial infections were 66·7% (34/51), viral 19·6% (10/51) and invasive fungal diseases (IFD) 13·7% (7/51). Among the 112 patients treated with idelalisib, 32·1% (36/112) experienced one or more infections, for a total of 48 episodes. MDI were 54·2% (26/48). Bacterial infections were 34·6% (9/26), viral 61·5% (16/26) and IFD 3·8% (1/26). With ibrutinib, the rate of bacterial infections was significantly higher compared to idelalisib (66·7% vs. 34·6%; P = 0·007), while viral infections were most frequent in idelalisib (61·5% vs. 19·6%; P < 0·001). Although a higher rate of IFD was observed in patients treated with ibrutinib, the difference was not statistically significant (13·7% vs. 3·8% respectively; P = 0·18). Bacteria are the most frequent infections with ibrutinib, while viruses are most frequently involved with idelalisib.

Indexed as

AdenineAgammaglobulinaemia Tyrosine KinaseAgedAged, 80 and overBacterial InfectionsCase-Control StudiesEnzyme InhibitorsFemaleHumansInvasive Fungal InfectionsItalyLymphoproliferative DisordersMaleMiddle AgedMolecular Targeted TherapyOpportunistic InfectionsAdenineAgammaglobulinaemia Tyrosine KinaseEnzyme InhibitorsibrutinibidelalisibPiperidinesProtein Kinase InhibitorsPurinesQuinazolinonesinfectionslymphoproliferative diseasestargeted therapy

Identifiers

PMID33058237
PMCPMC8246914
OpenAlexW3092865733

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.