ReviewWest African journal of medicine2020
Atypical Diabetes Presentations in Sub-Saharan Africa Classification Puzzle and Possible Role of Precision Medicine.
Review in West African journal of medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Improving Precision Diagnosis and Treatment of Diabetes in Low-Resource Settings in Africa Through Structured Clinical Phenotyping: A Narrative Review.Diabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders · 2026Review
- Type 1 diabetes in low and middle-income countries - Tanzania a streak of hope.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Precision in the diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus, a complex heterogeneous disease is increasingly required to achieve treatment goals and prevent complications. Several reviews over decades have not completely solved the diabetes classification puzzle. African clinicians are sometimes confronted with the difficulty of classifying a newly diagnosed diabetes patient presenting atypically. These unusual presentations fall into those with diagnosis of either clinical type 1 or 2 diabetes but having some diagnostic and/or therapeutic features at variance with what are seen in the Western nations, those with tropical diabetes and those known as ketosis-prone type 2 diabetes (KPD). Reports from many African countries indicate that patients do not fit the classic pattern seen in the Western nations. In recent times, there has been groundswell of pressures and proposed models to evolve a more accurate classification of diabetes and the recent 2019 WHO diabetes classification seems to have acknowledged and accommodated these concerns. Perhaps advances in genomic knowledge could help with precision in diabetes classification, especially in Africa. This review seeks to highlight the challenges often encountered with classifying diabetes patients in Africa, and proffer suggestions on the way forward including possible benefit from advances in molecular genomics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
33058135PMC11250995W3092840742What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.