Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33057977›Full record

ArticleThe European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care2020

General practitioners' income and activity: the impact of multi-professional group practice in France.

Matthieu Cassou, Julien Mousquès, Carine Franc

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Predictors of high-performing family medicine clinics: Prospective cohort study in Alberta.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Comparing GPs according to their model of practice: are multiprofessional group practices associated with more favourable working conditions?The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Matthieu CassouCentre for Research in Epidemiology and Population Health, French National Institute of Health and Medical Research (INSERM U1018), Université Paris-Saclay, Université Paris-Sud, UVSQ, 16 Avenue Paul Vaillant Couturier, 94807 Cedex, Villejuif, France. matthieu.cassou@inserm.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1966-3966
Julien MousquèsInstitute for Research and Information in Health Economics (IRDES), Paris, France.
Carine FrancCentre for Research in Epidemiology and Population Health, French National Institute of Health and Medical Research (INSERM U1018), Université Paris-Saclay, Université Paris-Sud, UVSQ, 16 Avenue Paul Vaillant Couturier, 94807 Cedex, Villejuif, France.
Université Paris-Sud · FRInstitut de Recherche et de Documentation en Économie de la Santé · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

France has first experimented, in 2009, and then generalized a practice level add-on payment to promote Multi-Professional Primary Care Groups (MPCGs). Team-based practices are intended to improve both the efficiency of outpatient care supply and the attractiveness of medically underserved areas for healthcare professionals. To evaluate its financial attractiveness and thus the sustainability of MPCGs, we analyzed the evolution of incomes (self-employed income and wages) of General Practitioners (GPs) enrolled in a MPCG, compared with other GPs. We also studied the impacts of working in a MPCG on GPs' activity through both the quantity of medical services provided and the number of patients encountered. Our analyses were based on a quasi-experimental design, with a panel dataset over the period 2008-2014. We accounted for the selection into MPCG by using together coarsened exact matching and difference-in-differences (DID) design with panel-data regression models to account for unobserved heterogeneity. We show that GPs enrolled in MPCGs during the period exhibited an increase in income 2.5% higher than that of other GPs; there was a greater increase in the number of patients seen by the GPs' (88 more) without involving a greater increase in the quantity of medical services provided. A complementary cross-sectional analysis for 2014 showed that these changes were not detrimental to quality in terms of bonuses related to the French pay-for-performance program for the year 2014. Hence, our results suggest that labor and income concerns should not be a barrier to the development of MPCGs, and that MPCGs may improve patient access to primary care services.

Indexed as

General PracticeGeneral PractitionersGroup PracticeIncomeCross-Sectional StudiesFranceHumansReimbursement, IncentiveSalaries and Fringe BenefitsDifference-in-differencesGeneral practitionerIncomePrimary careTeamwork

Identifiers

PMID33057977
OpenAlexW3092879168

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.