Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33057937›Full record

ReviewThe AAPS journal2020

Identification and Utilization of Biomarkers to Predict Response to Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors.

Ole Gjoerup, Charlotte A Brown, Jeffrey S Ross, Richard S P Huang, Alexa Schrock, James Creeden, David Fabrizio, Khaled Tolba

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in The AAPS journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Harnessing biomarkers to guide immunotherapy in esophageal cancer: toward precision oncology.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Proteomic Investigation of Immune Checkpoints and Some of Their Inhibitors.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. The future of cancer immunotherapy: DNA vaccines leading the way.Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) · 2023
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ole GjoerupFoundation Medicine, Inc, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA. ogjoerup@foundationmedicine.com.
Charlotte A BrownFoundation Medicine, Inc, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Jeffrey S RossFoundation Medicine, Inc, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Richard S P HuangFoundation Medicine, Inc, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Alexa SchrockFoundation Medicine, Inc, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
James CreedenFoundation Medicine, Inc, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
David FabrizioFoundation Medicine, Inc, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Khaled TolbaFoundation Medicine, Inc, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Foundation Medicine (United States)

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICPI) have revolutionized cancer therapy and provided clinical benefit to thousands of patients. Despite durable responses in many tumor types, the majority of patients either fail to respond at all or develop resistance to the ICPI. Furthermore, ICPI treatment can be accompanied by serious adverse effects. There is an urgent need for identification of patient populations that will benefit from ICPI as single agents and when used in combinations. As ICPI have achieved regulatory approvals, accompanying biomarkers including PD-L1 immunohistochemistry (IHC) and tumor mutational burden (TMB) have also received approvals for some indications. The ICPI pembrolizumab was the first example of a tissue-agnostic FDA approval based on tumor microsatellite instability (MSI)/deficient mismatch repair (dMMR) biomarker status, rather than on tumor histology assessment. Several other ICPI-associated biomarkers are in the exploratory stage, including quantification of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs), gene expression profiling (GEP) of an inflamed microenvironment, and neoantigen prediction. TMB and PD-L1 expression can predict a subset of responses, but they fail to predict all responses to checkpoint blockade. While a single biomarker is currently limited in its ability to fully capture the complexity of the tumor-immune microenvironment, a combination of biomarkers is emerging as a method to improve predictive power. Here we review the steadily growing impact of comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) for development and utilization of predictive biomarkers by simultaneously capturing TMB, MSI, and the status of genomic targets that confer sensitivity or resistance to immunotherapy, as well as detecting inflammation through RNA expression signatures.

Indexed as

Antigens, NeoplasmAntineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalB7-H1 AntigenBiomarkers, TumorDNA Mismatch RepairDrug Resistance, NeoplasmHumansImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsImmunohistochemistryLymphocytes, Tumor-InfiltratingMicrosatellite InstabilityMutationNeoplasmsPrognosisProgression-Free SurvivalTumor MicroenvironmentAntigens, NeoplasmAntineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalB7-H1 AntigenBiomarkers, TumorCD274 protein, humanImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsBiomarkersComprehensive genomic profilingImmune checkpoint inhibitorsPD-L1Tumor mutational burden

Identifiers

PMID33057937
OpenAlexW3092945344

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.