Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33057865›Full record

ArticleInternational ophthalmology2021

Inverted internal limiting membrane flap technique in the surgical treatment of macular holes: 8-year experience.

Nisa Silva, Natália Ferreira, Bernardete Pessoa, Nuno Correia, João Melo Beirão, Angelina Meireles

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International ophthalmology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Nisa SilvaOphthalmology Department, Centro Hospitalar Universitário Do Porto, Largo Do Prof. Abel Salazar, 4099-001, Porto, Portugal. nisapinhosilva@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5607-3212
Natália FerreiraOphthalmology Department, Centro Hospitalar Universitário Do Porto, Largo Do Prof. Abel Salazar, 4099-001, Porto, Portugal.
Bernardete PessoaOphthalmology Department, Centro Hospitalar Universitário Do Porto, Largo Do Prof. Abel Salazar, 4099-001, Porto, Portugal.
Nuno CorreiaOphthalmology Department, Centro Hospitalar Universitário Do Porto, Largo Do Prof. Abel Salazar, 4099-001, Porto, Portugal.
João Melo BeirãoOphthalmology Department, Centro Hospitalar Universitário Do Porto, Largo Do Prof. Abel Salazar, 4099-001, Porto, Portugal.
Angelina MeirelesOphthalmology Department, Centro Hospitalar Universitário Do Porto, Largo Do Prof. Abel Salazar, 4099-001, Porto, Portugal.
Centro Hospitalar do Porto · PTUniversidade do Porto · PT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo evaluate the ellipsoid zone (EZ) structural recovery, hole closure rate, and visual acuity improvement after inverted internal limiting membrane (ILM) flap technique.

methodsRetrospective cohort of eyes affected by idiopathic macular holes (MH) that underwent pars plana vitrectomy combined with inverted ILM flap technique in a tertiary center, over an 8-year period (2011-2019). The main outcomes were the postoperative qualitative analysis of EZ structure on spectral-domain optical coherence tomography, hole closure rate, and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) improvement of ≥ 0.3 units in the logarithm of minimal angle of resolution (logMAR) scale.

resultsOur study included 76 eyes of 72 patients; 65% were female, with a mean age of 70 ± 8 years-old. Median (range) follow-up was 21 (3-92) months. Hole closure rate was 92%. Structural defects in EZ were observed in 66% of closed holes (EZ atrophy in 33%, EZ disruption in 22%, and EZ thinning in 11%). The mean final BCVA was 0.5 ± 0.4 logMAR (Snellen 20/63), but visual acuity improvement occurred in 80% of the eyes. Final BCVA was significantly worse in eyes with EZ atrophy compared with eyes with EZ disruption (0.75 vs. 0.36 logMAR, p = 0.004) and EZ thinning (0.75 vs. 0.32 logMAR, p = 0.015). In multivariate regression, minimum linear diameter (OR 1.01; IC 95% 1.01-1.02) independently predicted a final BCVA (logMAR) < 0.3 units.

conclusionInverted ILM flap technique provided a hole closure rate above 90%, similar to previous studies. Although the modest value of the final BCVA, a significant visual acuity improvement occurred in most eyes. Structural defects of EZ were found in more than half of closed MHs after surgery. Evidence of postoperative retinal atrophy was associated with a worse visual outcome.

Indexed as

Retinal PerforationsAgedBasement MembraneFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesTomography, Optical CoherenceVisual AcuityVitrectomyEllipsoid zone analysisInverted internal limiting membrane flap techniqueMacular hole

Identifiers

PMID33057865
OpenAlexW3093350387

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.