Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33057796›Full record

ArticleKnee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA2021

Distal remnant length can be measured reliably and predicts primary repair of proximal anterior cruciate ligament tears.

Harmen D Vermeijden, Brett Cerniglia, Douglas N Mintz, Maarten V Rademakers, Gino M M J Kerkhoffs, Jelle P van der List, Gregory S DiFelice

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Harmen D VermeijdenDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA.
Brett CernigliaDepartment of Radiology and Imaging, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA.
Douglas N MintzDepartment of Radiology and Imaging, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA.
Maarten V RademakersDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Spaarne Gasthuis Hospital, Hoofddorp, The Netherlands.
Gino M M J KerkhoffsDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Movement Science, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Jelle P van der ListDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA.
Gregory S DiFeliceDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA. difeliceg@hss.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9559-757X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo assess the reliability and predictive value of quantifying anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tear location on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and assess the predictive value of tear location on the eligibility for arthroscopic primary repair of proximal ACL tears.

methodsIn this case-control study, all adult patients undergoing acute ACL surgery between 2008 and 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. All patients were treated with the treatment algorithm of undergoing primary repair when proximal tears with sufficient tissue quality were present intraoperatively, and otherwise underwent single-bundle ACL reconstruction. Sagittal MRI images were reviewed to measure proximal and distal remnant lengths along the anterior aspect of the torn ligament, and tear location was calculated as distal remnant divided by total remnant length. Interobserver and intraobserver reliability for remnant measurements were calculated. Then, receiver operating curve analysis (ROC) was performed to calculate the optimal cut-off for the possibility of primary repair with the different measurements.

resultsTwo hundred and forty-eight patients were included, of which 151 underwent repair (61%). Inter- and intraobserver reliability ranged between 0.92 and 0.96 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.55-0.98] and 0.91-0.97 (95% CI 0.78-0.98, respectively). All patients with a tear location of  ≥ 80% on MRI could undergo repair, whereas all patients with tear location of < 60% required reconstruction. The positive predictive value of a proximal quarter tear (≥ 75%) on primary repair was 94%. Older age was correlated with more proximal tear location (p < 0.001), but there was no correlation between tear location and gender, BMI, or timing of surgery (all n.s).

conclusionThis study showed that tear location could reliably be quantified on MRI by assessing distal and proximal remnant lengths. Tear location in the proximal quarter of the ACL was found to have a positive predictive value for repairability of 94%. These findings may assist orthopaedic surgeons in evaluating which patients are eligible for primary ACL repair preoperatively. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Indexed as

Anterior Cruciate Ligament InjuriesAdultAgedArthroscopyCase-Control StudiesHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingReproducibility of ResultsRetrospective StudiesACL preservationAnterior cruciate ligamentMagnetic resonance imagingPreoperative assessmentPrimary repair

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.