Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33057753›Full record

ArticleCurrent microbiology2020

Literature-Based Phenotype Survey and In Silico Genotype Investigation of Antibiotic Resistance in the Genus Bifidobacterium.

Linyan Cao, Huahai Chen, Qinghao Wang, Baiyuan Li, Yunfei Hu, Changhui Zhao, Yongfei Hu, Yeshi Yin

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Current microbiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. A probioticGut microbes · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Insights into toxin-antitoxin systems in the genusApplied and environmental microbiology · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Distribution ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. The role ofGut microbes
    Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Linyan CaoKey Laboratory of Comprehensive Utilization of Advantage Plants Resources in Hunan South, College of Chemistry and Bioengineering, Hunan University of Science and Engineering, Yongzhou, 425199, Hunan, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6197-8684
Huahai ChenKey Laboratory of Comprehensive Utilization of Advantage Plants Resources in Hunan South, College of Chemistry and Bioengineering, Hunan University of Science and Engineering, Yongzhou, 425199, Hunan, China.
Qinghao WangKey Laboratory of Comprehensive Utilization of Advantage Plants Resources in Hunan South, College of Chemistry and Bioengineering, Hunan University of Science and Engineering, Yongzhou, 425199, Hunan, China.
Baiyuan LiKey Laboratory of Comprehensive Utilization of Advantage Plants Resources in Hunan South, College of Chemistry and Bioengineering, Hunan University of Science and Engineering, Yongzhou, 425199, Hunan, China.
Yunfei HuKey Laboratory of Comprehensive Utilization of Advantage Plants Resources in Hunan South, College of Chemistry and Bioengineering, Hunan University of Science and Engineering, Yongzhou, 425199, Hunan, China.
Changhui ZhaoKey Laboratory of Comprehensive Utilization of Advantage Plants Resources in Hunan South, College of Chemistry and Bioengineering, Hunan University of Science and Engineering, Yongzhou, 425199, Hunan, China.
Yongfei HuState Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100193, China. huyongfei@cau.edu.cn.
Yeshi YinKey Laboratory of Comprehensive Utilization of Advantage Plants Resources in Hunan South, College of Chemistry and Bioengineering, Hunan University of Science and Engineering, Yongzhou, 425199, Hunan, China. yinyeshi@huse.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6866-5525
Hunan University of Science and Engineering · CN

Funding

Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Province 2019JJ40092Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Province 2019JJ50198
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bifidobacteria are typical commensals inhabiting the human intestine and are beneficial to the host because of their probiotic properties. One of the risks concerning probiotics is the potential of introducing antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) to the host gut pathogens. This study was aimed to depict the general antibiotic resistance characteristics of the genus Bifidobacterium by combining the reported phenotype dataset and in silico genotype prediction. Bifidobacteria were mostly reported to be sensitive to beta-lactams, glycopeptides, chloramphenicol, and rifampicin, but resistant to aminoglycosides, polypeptides, quinolones, and mupirocin. Generally, the resistance phenotypes to erythromycin, tetracycline, fusidic acid, metronidazole, clindamycin, and trimethoprim were variable. Besides cmX and tetQ, characterized in bifidobacterial resident plasmids, 3520 putative ARGs were identified from 831 bifidobacterial genomes through BLASTP search. The identified ARGs matched thirty-eight reference ARGs, four of which seemed to be mutant housekeeping genes. The two high-abundant ARGs, tetW and ermX, were found to have different distribution traits. The predicted ARGs reasonably explained most of the corresponding resistant phenotypes in the published literature.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsBifidobacteriumComputer SimulationDrug Resistance, MicrobialGenes, BacterialGenotypeHumansPhenotypeAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

PMID33057753
OpenAlexW3093341418

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.