Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33057688›Full record

ArticleJournal of animal science2020

A low-density SNP genotyping panel for the accurate prediction of cattle breeds.

Antonio Reverter, Nicholas J Hudson, Sean McWilliam, Pamela A Alexandre, Yutao Li, Robert Barlow, Nina Welti, Hans Daetwyler, Laercio R Porto-Neto, Sonja Dominik

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of animal science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Better Multi-Breed Genomic Predictions for Tropical Bull Fertility Using a Breed-Adjusted Genomic Relationship Matrix.Journal of animal breeding and genetics = Zeitschrift fur Tierzuchtung und Zuchtungsbiologie · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Antonio ReverterCSIRO Agriculture & Food, 306 Carmody Road, St. Lucia, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Nicholas J HudsonSchool of Agriculture and Food Sciences, The University of Queensland, Gatton, QLD, Australia.
Sean McWilliamCSIRO Agriculture & Food, 306 Carmody Road, St. Lucia, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Pamela A AlexandreCSIRO Agriculture & Food, 306 Carmody Road, St. Lucia, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Yutao LiCSIRO Agriculture & Food, 306 Carmody Road, St. Lucia, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Robert BarlowCSIRO Agriculture & Food, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Nina WeltiCSIRO Agriculture & Food, Waite Road, Urrbrae, SA, Australia.
Hans DaetwylerAgriculture Victoria Research, AgriBio, Bundoora, VIC, Australia.
Laercio R Porto-NetoCSIRO Agriculture & Food, 306 Carmody Road, St. Lucia, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Sonja DominikCSIRO Agriculture & Food, Chiswick, New England Highway, Armidale, NSW, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genomic tools to better define breed composition in agriculturally important species have sparked scientific and commercial industry interest. Knowledge of breed composition can inform multiple scientifically important decisions of industry application including DNA marker-assisted selection, identification of signatures of selection, and inference of product provenance to improve supply chain integrity. Genomic tools are expensive but can be economized by deploying a relatively small number of highly informative single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) scattered evenly across the genome. Using resources from the 1000 Bull Genomes Project we established calibration (more stringent quality criteria; N = 1,243 cattle) and validation (less stringent; N = 864) data sets representing 17 breeds derived from both taurine and indicine bovine subspecies. Fifteen successively smaller panels (from 500,000 to 50 SNP) were built from those SNP in the calibration data that increasingly satisfied 2 criteria, high differential allele frequencies across the breeds as measured by average Euclidean distance (AED) and high uniformity (even spacing) across the physical genome. Those SNP awarded the highest AED were in or near genes previously identified as important signatures of selection in cattle such as LCORL, NCAPG, KITLG, and PLAG1. For each panel, the genomic breed composition (GBC) of each animal in the validation dataset was estimated using a linear regression model. A systematic exploration of the predictive accuracy of the various sized panels was then undertaken on the validation population using 3 benchmarking approaches: (1) % error (expressed relative to the estimated GBC made from over 1 million SNP), (2) % breed misassignment (expressed relative to each individual's breed recorded), and (3) Shannon's entropy of estimated GBC across the 17 target breeds. Our analyses suggest that a panel of just 250 SNP represents an adequate balance between accuracy and cost-only modest gains in accuracy are made as one increases panel density beyond this point.

Indexed as

GenomePolymorphism, Single NucleotideAnimalsCattleGene FrequencyGenomicsGenotypeMaleaverage Euclidean distancecattlegenomic breed composition

Identifiers

PMID33057688
PMCPMC8202515

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.