Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33057684›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of epidemiology2021

Leveraging Technology to Blend Large-Scale Epidemiologic Surveillance With Social and Behavioral Science Methods: Successes, Challenges, and Lessons Learned Implementing the UNITE Longitudinal Cohort Study of HIV Risk Factors Among Sexual Minority Men in the United States.

H Jonathon Rendina, Ali J Talan, Nicola F Tavella, Jonathan Lopez Matos, Ruben H Jimenez, S Scott Jones, Brian Salfas, Drew Westmoreland

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of epidemiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Intersecting Structural Oppression and Suicidality Among Black Sexual Minority Male Adolescents and Emerging Adults.Journal of research on adolescence : the official journal of the Society for Research on Adolescence · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

H Jonathon Rendina
Ali J Talan
Nicola F Tavella
Jonathan Lopez Matos
Ruben H Jimenez
S Scott Jones
Brian Salfas
Drew Westmoreland

Funding

RISE Program Hunter College Option IIIR25GM060665 · NIGMS · HUNTER COLLEGE · PI ORTIZ, BENJAMIN D.,, SERRANO, PETER A · 2000 to 2022
$22.8M
Examining Modifiable Psychosocial Predictors of HIV Seroconversion in a Large Nationwide Cohort of High Risk MenUH3AI133674 · NIAID · WHITMAN-WALKER INSTITUTE, INC. · PI RENDINA, H. JONATHON · 2019 to 2021
$3.9M
Examining Modifiable Psychosocial Predictors of HIV Seroconversion in a Large Nationwide Cohort of High Risk MenUG3AI133674 · NIAID · HUNTER COLLEGE · PI RENDINA, H. JONATHON · 2017 to 2019
$3.2M
Following a U.S. National Cohort of Vulnerable Men to Improve HIV Prevention and CareUG3AI133675 · NIAID · GRADUATE SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH AND HEALTH POLICY · PI GROV, CHRISTIAN · 2017 to 2018
$2.6M
The Impact of Alcohol on PrEP Adherence in Vulnerable MenK01AA029047 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI WESTMORELAND, DREW ANNE · 2020 to 2024
$940k
NIAAA NIH HHS K01 AA029047NIAID NIH HHS UG3 AI133674NIAID NIH HHS UG3 AI133675NIAID NIH HHS UH3 AI133674NIGMS NIH HHS R25 GM060665
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The use of digital technologies to conduct large-scale research with limited interaction (i.e., no in-person contact) and objective endpoints (i.e., biological testing) has significant potential for the field of epidemiology, but limited research to date has been published on the successes and challenges of such approaches. We analyzed data from a cohort study of sexual minority men across the United States, collected using digital strategies during a 10-month period from 2017 to 2018. Overall, 113,874 individuals were screened, of whom 26,000 were invited to the study, 10,691 joined the study, and 7,957 completed all enrollment steps, including return of a human immunodeficiency virus-negative sample. We examined group differences in completion of the steps towards enrollment to inform future research and found significant differences according to several factors, including age and race. This study adds to prior work to provide further proof-of-concept for this limited-interaction, technology-mediated methodology, highlighting some of its strengths and challenges, including rapid access to more diverse populations but also potential for bias due to differential enrollment. This method has strong promise, and future implementation research is needed to better understand the roles of burden, privacy, access, and compensation, to enhance representativeness and generalizability of the data generated.

Indexed as

Sexual BehaviorAdolescentAdultEpidemiological MonitoringHIV InfectionsHomosexuality, MaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsSexual and Gender MinoritiesUnited StatesYoung Adultcohort methodsdigital technologyHIV preventionhome-based testingsexual minority men

Identifiers

PMID33057684
PMCPMC8024044

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.