Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33057600›Full record

ArticleHuman reproduction (Oxford, England)2020

Donor oocyte recipients do not benefit from preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy to improve pregnancy outcomes.

Nicole Doyle, Michelle Gainty, Allison Eubanks, Joseph Doyle, Heidi Hayes, Michael Tucker, Kate Devine, Alan DeCherney, Michael Levy, Samad Jahandideh and 1 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human reproduction (Oxford, England), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
6.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Nicole DoyleEunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility Fellowship Program, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.
Michelle GaintyDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology Residency Program, Womack Army Medical Center, Fort Bragg, NC 28303, USA.
Allison EubanksEunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility Fellowship Program, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.
Joseph DoyleShady Grove Fertility Center, Rockville, MD 20850, USA.
Heidi HayesDonor Egg Bank USA, Rockville, MD 20850, USA.
Michael TuckerShady Grove Fertility Center, Rockville, MD 20850, USA.
Kate DevineShady Grove Fertility Center, Rockville, MD 20850, USA.
Alan DeCherneyEunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility Fellowship Program, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.
Michael LevyShady Grove Fertility Center, Rockville, MD 20850, USA.
Samad JahandidehShady Grove Fertility Center, Rockville, MD 20850, USA.
Micah HillEunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility Fellowship Program, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.
Shady Grove Fertility Center · USEunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development · USWomack Army Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

study questionDo donor oocyte recipients benefit from preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A)? SUMMARY ANSWER: PGT-A did not improve the likelihood of live birth for recipients of vitrified donor oocytes, but it did avoid embryo transfer in cycles with no euploid embryos. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Relative to slow freeze, oocyte vitrification has led to increased live birth from cryopreserved oocytes and has led to widespread use of this technology in donor egg IVF programs. However, oocyte cryopreservation has the potential to disrupt the meiotic spindle leading to abnormal segregation of chromosome during meiosis II and ultimately increased aneuploidy in resultant embryos. Therefore, PGT-A might have benefits in vitrified donor egg cycles. In contrast, embryos derived from young donor oocytes are expected to be predominantly euploid, and trophectoderm biopsy may have a negative effect relative to transfer without biopsy. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: This is a paired cohort study analyzing donor oocyte-recipient cycles with or without PGT-A performed from 2012 to 2018 at 47 US IVF centers. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING,

methodsVitrified donor oocyte cycles were analyzed for live birth as the main outcome measure. Outcomes from donors whose oocytes were used by at least two separate recipient couples, one couple using PGT-A (study group) and one using embryos without PGT-A (control group), were compared. Generalized estimating equation models controlled for confounders and nested for individual donors contributing to both PGT-A and non-PGT-A cohorts, enabling a single donor to serve as her own control. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: In total, 1291 initiated recipient cycles from 223 donors were analyzed, including 262 cycles with and 1029 without PGT-A. The median aneuploidy rate per recipient was 25%. Forty-three percent of PGT-A cycles had only euploid embryos, whereas only 12.7% of cycles had no euploid embryos. On average 1.09 embryos were transferred in the PGT-A group compared to 1.38 in the group without PGT-A (P < 0.01). Live birth occurred in 53.8% of cycles with PGT-A versus 55.8% without PGT-A (P = 0.44). Similar findings persisted in cumulative live birth from per recipient cycle. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: Pooled clinical data from 47 IVF clinics introduced PGT-A heterogeneity as genetic testing were performed using different embryology laboratories, PGT-A companies and testing platforms. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE

findingsPGT-A testing in donor oocyte-recipient cycles does not improve the chance for live birth nor decrease the risk for miscarriage in the first transfer cycle but does increase cost and time for the patient. Further studies are required to test if our findings can be applied to the young infertility patient population using autologous oocytes. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): No external funding was used for this study. There are no conflicts of interest to declare. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: N/A.

Indexed as

AneuploidyPregnancy OutcomeCohort StudiesFemaleGenetic TestingHumansOocytesPregnancyRetrospective Studiesdonor oocyte-recipient cyclesinfertilityoocyte donationPGT-Apreimplantation genetic testing

Identifiers

PMID33057600
PMCPMC7821705
OpenAlexW3093266953

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.