Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33057566›Full record

ArticleJAMA oncology2020

Multi-institutional Analysis of Prognostic Factors and Outcomes After Hypofractionated Stereotactic Radiotherapy to the Resection Cavity in Patients With Brain Metastases.

Kerstin A Eitz, Simon S Lo, Hany Soliman, Arjun Sahgal, Aimee Theriault, Mark B Pinkham, Matthew C Foote, Andrew J Song, Wenyin Shi, Kristin J Redmond and 5 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 49 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 71 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. DEGRO guideline for personalized radiotherapy of brain metastases and leptomeningeal carcinomatosis in patients with breast cancer.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2024
    Guideline
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Radionecrosis risk and local control after CyberKnifeRadiation oncology (London, England) · 2026
    Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Radiotherapeutic management of brain metastases in patients with breast cancer: a narrative review.Translational breast cancer research : a journal focusing on translational research in breast cancer · 2026
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 10 institutions in 4 countries.

Kerstin A EitzDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Munich, Germany.
Simon S LoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle.
Hany SolimanDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Arjun SahgalDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Aimee TheriaultDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Mark B PinkhamDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Matthew C FooteDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Andrew J SongDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College & Cancer Center at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Wenyin ShiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College & Cancer Center at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Kristin J RedmondDepartment of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Chenchen GuiDepartment of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Aryavarta M S KumarRadiation Oncology Service, Cleveland Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio.
Mitchell MachtayDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio.
Bernhard MeyerDepartment of Neurosurgery, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Munich, Germany.
Stephanie E CombsDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Munich, Germany.
Johns Hopkins University · USPrincess Alexandra Hospital · AUSunnybrook Health Science Centre · CAThomas Jefferson University · USHelmholtz Zentrum München · DEKlinikum rechts der Isar · DETechnical University of Munich · DEUniversity Hospitals of Cleveland · USUniversity of Toronto · CAUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

importanceFor brain metastases, the combination of neurosurgical resection and postoperative hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (HSRT) is an emerging therapeutic approach preferred to the prior practice of postoperative whole-brain radiotherapy. However, mature large-scale outcome data are lacking.

objectiveTo evaluate outcomes and prognostic factors after HSRT to the resection cavity in patients with brain metastases. DESIGN, SETTING, AND

participantsAn international, multi-institutional cohort study was performed in 558 patients with resected brain metastases and postoperative HSRT treated between December 1, 2003, and October 31, 2019, in 1 of 6 participating centers. Exclusion criteria were prior cranial radiotherapy (including whole-brain radiotherapy) and early termination of treatment. EXPOSURES: A median total dose of 30 Gy (range, 18-35 Gy) and a dose per fraction of 6 Gy (range, 5-10.7 Gy) were applied. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary end points were overall survival, local control (LC), and the analysis of prognostic factors associated with overall survival and LC. Secondary end points included distant intracranial failure, distant progression, and the incidence of neurologic toxicity.

resultsA total of 558 patients (mean [SD] age, 61 [0.50] years; 301 [53.9%] female) with 581 resected cavities were analyzed. The median follow-up was 12.3 months (interquartile range, 5.0-25.3 months). Overall survival was 65% at 1 year, 46% at 2 years, and 33% at 3 years, whereas LC was 84% at 1 year, 75% at 2 years, and 71% at 3 years. Radiation necrosis was present in 48 patients (8.6%) and leptomeningeal disease in 73 patients (13.1%). Neurologic toxic events according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events grade 3 or higher occurred in 16 patients (2.8%) less than 6 months and 24 patients (4.1%) greater than 6 months after treatment. Multivariate analysis identified a Karnofsky Performance Status score of 80% or greater (hazard ratio [HR], 0.61; 95% CI, 0.46-0.82; P < .001), 22 to 33 days between resection and radiotherapy (HR, 1.50; 95% CI, 1.07-2.10; P = .02), and a controlled primary tumor (HR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.52-0.90; P = .007) as prognostic factors associated with overall survival. For LC, a single brain metastasis (HR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.35-0.93; P = .03) and a controlled primary tumor (HR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.39-0.92; P = .02) were significant in the multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: To date, this cohort study includes one of the largest series of patients with brain metastases and postoperative HSRT and appears to confirm an excellent risk-benefit profile of local HSRT to the resection cavity. Additional studies will help determine radiation dose-volume parameters and provide a better understanding of synergistic effects with systemic and immunotherapies.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsRadiosurgeryCohort StudiesFemaleHumansMiddle AgedPrognosisRetrospective StudiesTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID33057566
PMCPMC7563677
OpenAlexW3093123863

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.