Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33057399›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Tuberculosis screening in household contacts of pulmonary tuberculosis patients in an urban setting.

Banurekha Velayutham, Lavanya Jayabal, Basilea Watson, Saraswathy Jagadeesan, Dhanalakshmi Angamuthu, Priscilla Rebecca, Bella Devaleenal, Dina Nair, Srikanth Tripathy, Sriram Selvaraju

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. An adapted scale to measure perceived TB and HIV stigma during household contact investigation.The international journal of tuberculosis and lung disease : the official journal of the International Union against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Household drug-resistant TB contact tracing in Tajikistan.The international journal of tuberculosis and lung disease : the official journal of the International Union against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Banurekha VelayuthamICMR- National Institute for Research in Tuberculosis, Chennai, India.ORCID 0000-0001-6425-4569
Lavanya JayabalNational Tuberculosis Elimination Programme, Chennai, India.
Basilea WatsonICMR- National Institute for Research in Tuberculosis, Chennai, India.
Saraswathy JagadeesanICMR- National Institute for Research in Tuberculosis, Chennai, India.
Dhanalakshmi AngamuthuICMR- National Institute for Research in Tuberculosis, Chennai, India.
Priscilla RebeccaICMR- National Institute for Research in Tuberculosis, Chennai, India.
Bella DevaleenalICMR- National Institute for Research in Tuberculosis, Chennai, India.
Dina NairICMR- National Institute for Research in Tuberculosis, Chennai, India.
Srikanth TripathyICMR- National Institute for Research in Tuberculosis, Chennai, India.
Sriram SelvarajuICMR- National Institute for Research in Tuberculosis, Chennai, India.ORCID 0000-0003-0369-6640
National Institute of Research in Tuberculosis · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHousehold contacts (HHC) of tuberculosis (TB) patients are at risk of TB infection and disease. The study assessed the utility of "Household contact card and register" for screening of HHC of pulmonary TB (PTB) patients for TB and explored the reasons for HHC not being screened and followed-up.

methodsThe "Household contact card and register" was implemented by the Health Care Workers (HCW) of the TB Control Programme in Chennai District for screening HHC of index PTB patients initiated on treatment between June and August, 2018. Contacts were required to be screened within 2 months of treatment initiation of the index patient. Details collected included age, gender, smoking, alcohol use, immunosuppressive conditions and TB treatment. Symptom screening along with chest radiograph and or sputum examination was attempted. Follow-up TB screening at 6 and 12 months were performed. Screening of HHC was compared pre and post implementation phase. Proportions were computed for the data analysed.

resultsHHC information was documented for 93% (1268/1364) of Index PTB patients. The main reasons of non-listing of HHC in 96 PTB patients were HCW non-availability or non-co-operation of the HHC. There were 2150 (80%) contacts who were screened for TB. Inconvenient time, feeling healthy, stigma, out-station visit were the main reasons for 537 contacts not undergoing TB screening. Anti-TB treatment was initiated in 21 (1%) of contacts diagnosed with TB. Preventive therapy was initiated in 59% (81/138) of contacts aged <6 years. The screening of HHC improved from 36% to 80% during the implementation phase. Follow-up TB screening at 12 months was performed in 50% of HHC and 2 incident TB cases were identified.

conclusion"Household contact card and register" is a useful tool for HCWs for TB screening in HHC of PTB patients. Reasons for non-adherence to contact screening needs to be addressed.

Indexed as

Family CharacteristicsAdolescentAdultAntibiotic ProphylaxisAntitubercular AgentsChildChild, PreschoolContact TracingFeasibility StudiesFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHealth Plan ImplementationHumansIndiaMaleMass ScreeningAntitubercular Agents

Identifiers

PMID33057399
PMCPMC7561118
OpenAlexW3093463173

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.