Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33057362›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Barriers and facilitators of education provided during rehabilitation of people with spinal cord injuries: A qualitative description.

Alessio Conti, Valerio Dimonte, Antonella Rizzi, Marco Clari, Silvia Mozzone, Lorenza Garrino, Sara Campagna, Alberto Borraccino

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. The Spinal Cord Injury Self-Management Program: A Pilot.OTJR : occupation, participation and health · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Alessio ContiDepartment of Public Health and Pediatrics, University of Torino, Torino, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-4301-8924
Valerio DimonteDepartment of Public Health and Pediatrics, University of Torino, Torino, Italy.
Antonella RizziDepartment of Public Health and Pediatrics, University of Torino, Torino, Italy.
Marco ClariDepartment of Public Health and Pediatrics, University of Torino, Torino, Italy.
Silvia MozzoneSpinal Unit, A.O.U. Città della Salute e della Scienza Hospital of Torino, Torino, Italy.
Lorenza GarrinoDepartment of Public Health and Pediatrics, University of Torino, Torino, Italy.
Sara CampagnaDepartment of Public Health and Pediatrics, University of Torino, Torino, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2722-1818
Alberto BorraccinoDepartment of Public Health and Pediatrics, University of Torino, Torino, Italy.
Azienda Ospedaliera Citta' della Salute e della Scienza di Torino · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAfter a spinal cord injury (SCI), individuals must acquire their maximum level of independence before returning to their previous social and working conditions. The education provided during rehabilitation is one of the basic but complex aspects that influence the health perspectives of people with SCI. Gaining the perspective of SCI survivors experienced barriers and resources to enhance the education process may assist healthcare professionals in understanding this complex aspect of their practice. Through a qualitative descriptive analysis, this study aimed to identify the perceived barriers and facilitators of education provided during the rehabilitation of individuals with SCI.

methodsA purposive sample of 22 adults with SCI and at least six months of home experience was recruited. Participants were assigned into four mini focus groups according to their level of independence. The focus groups were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analysed using a thematic analysis.

resultsThree themes were identified: the readiness to education, the individual characteristics, and the environmental and social characteristics influencing education. Participants perceived education to be an ongoing process made up of consecutive phases, each of which had to be overcome before participants felt ready to reappraise their health and well-being. This process was affected by individual, environmental, and social factors.

conclusionsEducation is constantly provided by all members of the rehabilitation team. These must stress the relevance of the contents presented, increase SCI survivors' motivation to set achievable goals, and consider filling the gap that the patients perceive between rehabilitation centres and available community resources. The findings of this study promote the design of structured educational programmes, increasing knowledge, and improve the health perspective of SCI survivors, their families, and providers.

Indexed as

MotivationAdultAgedFemaleFocus GroupsHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient Education as TopicQualitative ResearchSelf-ManagementSpinal Cord InjuriesSurvivors

Identifiers

PMID33057362
PMCPMC7561131
OpenAlexW3092894788

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.