ArticlePLoS genetics2020
A Rad51-independent pathway promotes single-strand template repair in gene editing.
Article in PLoS genetics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
38 citing papers in PubMed, 51 citations in OpenAlex.
- Discovery and engineering of retrons for precise genome editing.Nature biotechnology · 2026Article
- Systematic Profiling of ssODN Determinants Establishes Optimized LbCas12a-Mediated HDR for Precise Genome Editing inJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Cyanine-modified ssODNs enhance CRISPR-Cas9 HDR in stem cell embryo models via chromatin and chemical modulation.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Enhancement of single-stranded template annealing activity by Rad52 during repair of CRISPR-induced dsDNA breaks.Nucleic acids research · 2026Article
- Repurposing clinically safe drugs for DNA repair pathway choice in CRISPR genome editing and synthetic lethality.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Circular single stranded DNA potentiates non-viral gene insertion in hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Arp2/3 and type-I myosins control chromosome mobility and end-resection at double-strand breaks in S. cerevisiae.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Review
- Autophagy induction enhances homologous recombination-associated CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing.Nucleic acids research · 2025Article
- Rescue of the disease-associated phenotype in CRISPR-corrected hiPSCs as a therapeutic approach for inherited retinal dystrophies.Molecular therapy. Nucleic acids · 2025Article
- Checkpoint and recombination pathways independently suppress rates of spontaneous homology-directed chromosomal translocations in budding yeast.Frontiers in genetics · 2025Article
- Deletion of IRC19 Causes Defects in DNA Double-Strand Break Repair Pathways in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.Journal of microbiology (Seoul, Korea) · 2024Article
- Enhancing homology-directed repair efficiency with HDR-boosting modular ssDNA donor.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Improved gene editing and fluorescent-protein tagging inWellcome open research · 2024Article
- Efficient high-precision homology-directed repair-dependent genome editing by HDRobust.Nature methods · 2023Article
- Fanconi anemia associated protein 20 (FAAP20) plays an essential role in homology-directed repair of DNA double-strand breaks.Communications biology · 2023Article
- New advances in CRISPR/Cas-mediated precise gene-editing techniques.Disease models & mechanisms · 2023Review
- Resolution of sequence divergence for repeat-mediated deletions shows a polarity that is mediated by MLH1.Nucleic acids research · 2023Article
- In search of an ideal template for therapeutic genome editing: A review of current developments for structure optimization.Frontiers in genome editing · 2023Review
- Specific correction of pyruvate kinase deficiency-causing point mutations by CRISPR/Cas9 and single-stranded oligodeoxynucleotides.Frontiers in genome editing · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The Rad51/RecA family of recombinases perform a critical function in typical repair of double-strand breaks (DSBs): strand invasion of a resected DSB end into a homologous double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) template sequence to initiate repair. However, repair of a DSB using single stranded DNA (ssDNA) as a template, a common method of CRISPR/Cas9-mediated gene editing, is Rad51-independent. We have analyzed the genetic requirements for these Rad51-independent events in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by creating a DSB with the site-specific HO endonuclease and repairing the DSB with 80-nt single-stranded oligonucleotides (ssODNs), and confirmed these results by Cas9-mediated DSBs in combination with a bacterial retron system that produces ssDNA templates in vivo. We show that single strand template repair (SSTR), is dependent on Rad52, Rad59, Srs2 and the Mre11-Rad50-Xrs2 (MRX) complex, but unlike other Rad51-independent recombination events, independent of Rdh54. We show that Rad59 acts to alleviate the inhibition of Rad51 on Rad52's strand annealing activity both in SSTR and in single strand annealing (SSA). Gene editing is Rad51-dependent when double-stranded oligonucleotides of the same size and sequence are introduced as templates. The assimilation of mismatches during gene editing is dependent on the activity of Msh2, which acts very differently on the 3' side of the ssODN which can anneal directly to the resected DSB end compared to the 5' end. In addition DNA polymerase Polδ's 3' to 5' proofreading activity frequently excises a mismatch very close to the 3' end of the template. We further report that SSTR is accompanied by as much as a 600-fold increase in mutations in regions adjacent to the sequences directly undergoing repair. These DNA polymerase ζ-dependent mutations may compromise the accuracy of gene editing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.