Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33057328›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Modeling and comparing data mining algorithms for prediction of recurrence of breast cancer.

Alireza Mosayebi, Barat Mojaradi, Ali Bonyadi Naeini, Seyed Hamid Khodadad Hosseini

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Prediction of Breast Cancer using Machine Learning Approaches.Journal of biomedical physics & engineering · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Alireza MosayebiDepartment of Management and Business Engineering, School of Progress Engineering, Iran University of Science and Technology, Tehran, Iran.
Barat MojaradiDepartment of Geomatics, School of Civil Engineering, Iran University of Science and Technology, Tehran, Iran.ORCID 0000-0001-9795-692X
Ali Bonyadi NaeiniDepartment of Management and Business Engineering, School of Progress Engineering, Iran University of Science and Technology, Tehran, Iran.ORCID 0000-0003-3119-551X
Seyed Hamid Khodadad HosseiniDepartment of Management, Faculty of Management and Economics, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Breast cancer is the most common invasive cancer and the second leading cause of cancer death in women. and regrettably, this rate is increasing every year. One of the aspects of all cancers, including breast cancer, is the recurrence of the disease, which causes painful consequences to the patients. Moreover, the practical application of data mining in the field of breast cancer can help to provide some necessary information and knowledge required by physicians for accurate prediction of breast cancer recurrence and better decision-making. The main objective of this study is to compare different data mining algorithms to select the most accurate model for predicting breast cancer recurrence. This study is cross-sectional and data gathering of this research performed from June 2018 to June 2019 from the official statistics of Ministry of Health and Medical Education and the Iran Cancer Research Center for patients with breast cancer who had been followed for a minimum of 5 years from February 2014 to April 2019, including 5471 independent records. After initial pre-processing in dataset and variables, seven new and conventional data mining algorithms have been applied that each one represents one kind of data mining approach. Results show that the C5.0 algorithm possibly could be a helpful tool for the prediction of breast cancer recurrence at the stage of distant recurrence and nonrecurrence, especially in the first to third years. also, LN involvement rate, Her2 value, Tumor size, free or closed tumor margin were found to be the most important features in our dataset to predict breast cancer recurrence.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsBreast NeoplasmsCross-Sectional StudiesDatabases, FactualData MiningDecision TreesErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesFemaleHumansInteratrial BlockIranLymphatic MetastasisModels, BiologicalNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalNeural Networks, ComputerSupport Vector MachineERBB2 protein, humanErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine Kinases

Identifiers

PMID33057328
PMCPMC7561198

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.