ArticleScientific reports2020
Factors predicting final visual outcome in quiescent proliferative diabetic retinopathy.
Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Widefield swept-source optical coherence tomography angiography metrics associated with neovascular glaucoma in patients with proliferative diabetic retinopathy.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2024Article
- Artificial intelligence method based on multi-feature fusion for automatic macular edema (ME) classification on spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) images.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2023Article
- A prediction model for worsening diabetic retinopathy after panretinal photocoagulation.Diabetology & metabolic syndrome · 2022Article
- The Opto-Respiratory Compromise: Balancing Oxygen Supply and Light Transmittance in the Retina.Physiology (Bethesda, Md.) · 2022Review
- Quantitative analysis of retinal microvascular changes in prediabetic and diabetic patients.Indian journal of ophthalmology · 2021Article
- Risk factors associated with progression of diabetic retinopathy in eyes treated with panretinal photocoagulation.Scientific reports · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To investigate factors reflecting visual outcome and macular perfusion in quiescent proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) patients after panretinal photocoagulation (PRP). We included 118 patients with quiescent PDR who had completed PRP. All participants had standardized interview to determine ocular history, smoking status, cardiovascular risk factors, and history of diabetic mellitus (DM). Foveal avascular zone (FAZ) area, retinal vessel density (VD) and vessel length density (VLD) were measured using optical coherence tomography angiography. VD was negatively correlated with hypertension, diabetic foot, HbA1c, and time after PRP (β = - 0.181, P = 0.046; β = - 0.231, P = 0.020; β = - 0.244, P = 0.010; β = - 0.278, P = 0.029). FAZ area of superficial capillary plexus and deep capillary plexus (DCP) was positively correlated with DM duration and diabetic foot (β = 0.178, P = 0.047; β = 0.293, P = 0.002; β = 0.252, P = 0.045; β = 0.304, P = 0.002). Macular perfusion state in patients with quiescent PDR was associated with diabetic foot, DM duration, HbA1c, and time after PRP. Of note, diabetic foot showed the strongest correlation with macular perfusion among various systemic factors. VLD, especially in DCP was associated with poor visual outcome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.