Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33057080›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2020

A single dose of estrogen during hemorrhagic shock protects against Kidney Injury whereas estrogen restoration in ovariectomized mice is ineffective.

Marie Buléon, Mélodie Cuny, Jimmy Grellier, Pierre-Yves Charles, Julie Belliere, Audrey Casemayou, Jean-François Arnal, Joost-Peter Schanstra, Ivan Tack

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Sex determines cardiac and renal Vulnerability to chronic hemoglobin toxicity.Biomedicine & pharmacotherapy = Biomedecine & pharmacotherapie · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Sex-specific glomerular filtration rate changes in response to acute hemoglobin exposure.Biomedicine & pharmacotherapy = Biomedecine & pharmacotherapie · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Marie BuléonInstitute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Disease, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM), U1048, Toulouse, France.
Mélodie CunyInstitute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Disease, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM), U1048, Toulouse, France.
Jimmy GrellierInstitute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Disease, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM), U1048, Toulouse, France.
Pierre-Yves CharlesInstitute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Disease, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM), U1048, Toulouse, France.
Julie BelliereInstitute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Disease, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM), U1048, Toulouse, France.
Audrey CasemayouInstitute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Disease, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM), U1048, Toulouse, France.
Jean-François ArnalInstitute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Disease, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM), U1048, Toulouse, France.
Joost-Peter SchanstraInstitute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Disease, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM), U1048, Toulouse, France.
Ivan TackInstitute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Disease, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM), U1048, Toulouse, France. ivan.tack@univ-tlse3.fr.
Université Toulouse III - Paul Sabatier · FRInserm · FRInstitut des Maladies Métaboliques et Cardiovasculaires · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The protective effect of estrogens against chronic glomerular diseases is admitted but remains debated during acute kidney injury (AKI). Using a model of resuscitated hemorrhagic shock in C57/Bl6 female mice, this study evaluated at 1 and 21 days the renal effect of (1) endogenous estrogen, using ovariectomized mice with or without chronic estrogen restoration, or (2) exogenous estrogen, using a single administration of a pharmacological dose during shock resuscitation. In both ovariectomized and intact mice, hemorrhagic shock induced epithelial cell damages (assessed by KIM-1 renal expression) with secondary renal fibrosis but without significant decrease in GFR at day 21. Ovariectomy with or without estrogen restoration have no significant effect on renal damages and dysfunction. This lack of effect was associated with a marked (> 80%) reduction of total kidney GPR30 expression. By contrast, a single high dose of estradiol in intact mice reduced renal KIM-1 expression by 2/3, attenuated the severity of cell death related to pyroptosis, and prevented the increase of fibrosis by 1/3. This provides a rationale to investigate the benefits of a single administration of estrogen or estrogen modulators during acute kidney injuries in males. Furthermore, the cost/benefit ratio of such administration should be investigated in Human.

Indexed as

AnimalsEstrogensFemaleHumansKidneyMiceMice, Inbred C57BLOvariectomyReceptors, EstrogenReceptors, G-Protein-CoupledShock, HemorrhagicTreatment FailureEstrogensGPER1 protein, mouseReceptors, EstrogenReceptors, G-Protein-Coupled

Identifiers

PMID33057080
PMCPMC7560623
OpenAlexW3092661485

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.