ArticleScientific reports2020
Systematic evaluation of particle loss during handling in the percutaneous transluminal angioplasty for eight different drug-coated balloons.
Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Long-Term Effectiveness and Safety of Femoropopliteal Drug-Coated Balloon Angioplasty : 5-Year Results of the Randomized Controlled EffPac Trial.Cardiovascular and interventional radiology · 2022Trial
- A Novel In Silico-Ex Vivo Model for Correlating Coating Transfer to Tissue with Local Drug-Coated Balloon-Vessel Contact Pressures.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2025Article
- Everolimus-encapsulation in Pluronic P123 self-assembled micelles as drug delivery systems for drug-coated balloons.International journal of pharmaceutics: X · 2024Article
- Investigating Balloon-Vessel Contact Pressure Patterns in Angioplasty: In Silico Insights for Drug-Coated Balloons.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2023Article
- Efficacy and safety of low dose aspirin plus clopidogrel in the treatment of elderly patients with symptomatic intracranial artery stenosis.Frontiers in neurology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Paclitaxel drug coated balloons (DCBs) should provide optimal drug transfer exclusively to the target tissue. The aim of this study was to evaluate the particle loss by handling during angioplasty. A robotic arm was developed for systematic and reproducible drug abrasion experiments. The contact force on eight different commercially available DCB types was gradually increased, and high-resolution microscopic images of the deflated and inflated balloons were recorded. Three types of DCBs were classified: no abrasion of the drug in both statuses (deflated and inflated), significant abrasion only in the inflated status, and significant abrasion in both statuses. Quantitative measurements via image processing confirmed the qualitative classification and showed changes of the drug area between 2.25 and 45.73% (13.28 ± 14.29%) in the deflated status, and between 1.66 and 40.41% (21.43 ± 16.48%) in the inflated status. The structures and compositions of the DCBs are different, some are significantly more susceptible to drug loss. Particle loss by handling during angioplasty leads to different paclitaxel doses in the target regions for same DCB types. Susceptibility to involuntary drug loss may cause side effects, such as varying effective paclitaxel doses, which may explain variations in studies regarding the therapeutic outcome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.