Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33055298›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of endocrinology2020

Functional imaging with 11C-metomidate PET for subtype diagnosis in primary aldosteronism.

Minna Soinio, Anna-Kaarina Luukkonen, Marko Seppänen, Jukka Kemppainen, Janne Seppänen, Juha-Pekka Pienimäki, Helena Leijon, Tiina Vesterinen, Johanna Arola, Eila Lantto and 15 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of endocrinology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07027254 (A Randomized Controlled Trial to Evaluate the Effect of Gallium-68 Pentixafor PET-CT on Surgical Outcomes in Patients With Primary Aldosteronism), which is not on this map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07027254 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

A Randomized Controlled Trial to Evaluate the Effect of Gallium-68 Pentixafor PET-CT on Surgical Outcomes in Patients With Primary Aldosteronism (The PETAL Trial)

TypeinterventionalSponsorSeoul National University HospitalRan2025 to 2027Enrolled90ConditionsPrimary Aldosteronism, Secondary Hypertension, Aldosterone-Producing Adenoma, Idiopathic HyperaldosteronismArms68Ga-pentixafor PET/CT
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. [Nature medicine · 2023
    Trial
  3. Primary aldosteronism.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2026
    Review
  4. Journal of human hypertension · 2026
    Article
  5. Approach to the Patient With Primary Aldosteronism: Role of Molecular Imaging.The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. The value of targeted CXCR4Frontiers in endocrinology · 2025
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. What We Know about and What Is New in Primary Aldosteronism.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  14. Article
  15. A comparison of the performance ofFrontiers in endocrinology · 2024
    Article
  16. [Theranostics · 2024
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Primary Aldosteronism: State-of-the-Art Review.American journal of hypertension · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

25 authors at 8 institutions in 2 countries.

Minna SoinioDepartment of Endocrinology, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland.
Anna-Kaarina LuukkonenDepartment of Internal Medicine and Tampere University, Tampere University Hospital, Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere, Finland.
Marko SeppänenTurku PET Centre, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
Jukka KemppainenTurku PET Centre, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
Janne SeppänenCentre for Vascular Surgery and Interventional Radiology, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland.
Juha-Pekka PienimäkiCentre for Vascular Surgery and Interventional Radiology, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland.
Helena LeijonDepartment of Pathology, University of Helsinki and HUSLAB, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
Tiina VesterinenDepartment of Pathology, University of Helsinki and HUSLAB, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
Johanna ArolaDepartment of Pathology, University of Helsinki and HUSLAB, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
Eila LanttoMedical Imaging Center, Radiology, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
Semi HelinTurku PET Centre, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
Ilkka TikkanenAbdominal Center, Nephrology, University of Helsinki, and Helsinki University Hospital, and Minerva Institute for Medical Research, Helsinki, Finland.
Saara MetsoDepartment of Internal Medicine and Tampere University, Tampere University Hospital, Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere, Finland.
Tuomas MirttiDepartment of Pathology, University of Helsinki and HUSLAB, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
Ilkka HeiskanenEndocrine Surgery, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Leena NorvioEndocrinology, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Mirja TiikkainenEndocrinology, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Tuula TikkanenInternal Medicine Outpatient Clinics, Helsinki, Finland.
Timo SaneEndocrinology, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Matti VälimäkiEndocrinology, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Celso E Gomez-SanchezDepartment of Pharmacology, G.V. (Sonny) Montgomery VA Medical Center, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, Mississippi, USA.
Ilkka PörstiDepartment of Internal Medicine and Tampere University, Tampere University Hospital, Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere, Finland.
Pirjo NuutilaDepartment of Endocrinology, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland.
Pasi I NevalainenDepartment of Internal Medicine and Tampere University, Tampere University Hospital, Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere, Finland.
Niina MatikainenEndocrinology, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Helsinki University Hospital · FITurku PET Centre · FIUniversity of Helsinki · FITampere University · FITampere University Hospital · FIG.V. (Sonny) Montgomery VA Medical Center · USInstitute for Molecular Medicine Finland · FIUniversity of Turku · FI

Funding

Tracking and Evaluation CoreU54GM115428 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MISSISSIPPI MED CTR · PI COMPRETTA, CAROLINE E. · 2016 to 2025
$38.2M
Adrenal cell ATP1A1 mutations and mechanisms of aldosterone biosynthesisR01HL144847 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF MISSISSIPPI MED CTR · PI GOMEZ-SANCHEZ, CELSO ENRIQUE · 2019 to 2022
$1.3M
Regulation of Mineralocorticoid Receptor ActionI01BX004681 · VA · G V SONNY MONTGOMERY VA MEDCIAL CENTER · PI GOMEZ-SANCHEZ, CELSO ENRIQUE · 2021 to 2023
–
BLRD VA I01 BX004681NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL144847NIGMS NIH HHS U54 GM115428
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveEndocrine Society guidelines recommend adrenal venous sampling (AVS) in primary aldosteronism (PA) if adrenalectomy is considered. We tested whether functional imaging of adrenal cortex with 11C-metomidate (11C-MTO) could offer a noninvasive alternative to AVS in the subtype classification of PA.

designWe prospectively recruited 58 patients with confirmed PA who were eligible for adrenal surgery.

methodsSubjects underwent AVS and 11C-MTO-PET without dexamethasone pretreatment in random order. The lateralization of 11C-MTO-PET and adrenal CT were compared with AVS in all subjects and in a prespecified adrenalectomy subgroup in which the diagnosis was confirmed with immunohistochemical staining for CYP11B2.

resultsIn the whole study population, the concordance of AVS and 11C-MTO-PET was 51% and did not differ from that of AVS and adrenal CT (53%). The concordance of AVS and 11C-MTO-PET was 55% in unilateral and 44% in bilateral PA. In receiver operating characteristics analysis, the maximum standardized uptake value ratio of 1.16 in 11C-MTO-PET had an AUC of 0.507 (P = n.s.) to predict allocation to adrenalectomy or medical therapy with sensitivity of 55% and specificity of 44%. In the prespecified adrenalectomy subgroup, AVS and 11C-MTO-PET were concordant in 10 of 19 subjects with CYP11B2-positive adenoma and in 6 of 10 with CYP11B2-positivity without an adenoma.

conclusionsThe concordance of 11C-MTO-PET with AVS was clinically suboptimal, and did not outperform adrenal CT. In a subgroup with CYP11B2-positive adenoma, 11C-MTO-PET identified 53% of cases. 11C-MTO-PET appeared to be inferior to AVS for subtype classification of PA.

Indexed as

Adrenal CortexAdultAgedCarbon RadioisotopesFemaleHumansHyperaldosteronismMaleMiddle AgedPositron-Emission TomographyProspective StudiesYoung AdultCarbon-11Carbon Radioisotopes

Identifiers

PMID33055298
PMCPMC8045447
OpenAlexW3082135232

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.