Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33055215›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2020

Theory of neuronal perturbome in cortical networks.

Sadra Sadeh, Claudia Clopath

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Input-dependent directionality of interactions between cortical areas.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Principles of cortical interactions in modular recurrent networks.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Exact linear theory of perturbation response in a space- and feature-dependent cortical circuit model.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Top-down modulation in canonical cortical circuits with short-term plasticity.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sadra SadehBioengineering Department, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-8159-5461
Claudia ClopathBioengineering Department, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, United Kingdom c.clopath@imperial.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0003-4507-8648
Imperial College London · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/N013956/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/N019008/1Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 200790/Z/16/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To unravel the functional properties of the brain, we need to untangle how neurons interact with each other and coordinate in large-scale recurrent networks. One way to address this question is to measure the functional influence of individual neurons on each other by perturbing them in vivo. Application of such single-neuron perturbations in mouse visual cortex has recently revealed feature-specific suppression between excitatory neurons, despite the presence of highly specific excitatory connectivity, which was deemed to underlie feature-specific amplification. Here, we studied which connectivity profiles are consistent with these seemingly contradictory observations, by modeling the effect of single-neuron perturbations in large-scale neuronal networks. Our numerical simulations and mathematical analysis revealed that, contrary to the prima facie assumption, neither inhibition dominance nor broad inhibition alone were sufficient to explain the experimental findings; instead, strong and functionally specific excitatory-inhibitory connectivity was necessary, consistent with recent findings in the primary visual cortex of rodents. Such networks had a higher capacity to encode and decode natural images, and this was accompanied by the emergence of response gain nonlinearities at the population level. Our study provides a general computational framework to investigate how single-neuron perturbations are linked to cortical connectivity and sensory coding and paves the road to map the perturbome of neuronal networks in future studies.

Indexed as

ConnectomeModels, NeurologicalAnimalsHumansNeuronsPerceptionVisual Cortexcortical connectivityneuronal perturbationperturbomesensory codingvisual cortex

Identifiers

PMID33055215
PMCPMC7604497
OpenAlexW3092800256

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.