Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33055169›Full record

ArticleScience advances2020

The gut microbiome defines social group membership in honey bee colonies.

Cassondra L Vernier, Iris M Chin, Boahemaa Adu-Oppong, Joshua J Krupp, Joel Levine, Gautam Dantas, Yehuda Ben-Shahar

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Science advances, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 57 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
57citing papers in PubMed
10.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

57 citing papers in PubMed, 123 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Division of labour as key driver of social evolution.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Review
  17. Mutualism and division of labour: a mutual expansion of concepts.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Cassondra L VernierDepartment of Biology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7381-3833
Iris M ChinDepartment of Biology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2621-3042
Boahemaa Adu-OppongEdison Family Center for Genome Sciences and Systems Biology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1185-6598
Joshua J KruppDepartment of Biology, University of Toronto Mississauga, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-6326-7859
Joel LevineDepartment of Biology, University of Toronto Mississauga, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-6254-6274
Gautam DantasEdison Family Center for Genome Sciences and Systems Biology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0455-8370
Yehuda Ben-ShaharDepartment of Biology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA. benshahary@wustl.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-2956-2926
Washington University in St. Louis · USUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

Tunable therapeutic modulation of the gut microbiome by engineered probioticsR01AT009741 · NCCIH · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI DANTAS, GAUTAM, MOON, TAE SEOK · 2018 to 2022
$3.5M
NCCIH NIH HHS R01 AT009741
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the honey bee, genetically related colony members innately develop colony-specific cuticular hydrocarbon profiles, which serve as pheromonal nestmate recognition cues. Yet, despite high intracolony relatedness, the innate development of colony-specific chemical signatures by individual colony members is largely determined by the colony environment, rather than solely relying on genetic variants shared by nestmates. Therefore, it is puzzling how a nongenic factor could drive the innate development of a quantitative trait that is shared by members of the same colony. Here, we provide one solution to this conundrum by showing that nestmate recognition cues in honey bees are defined, at least in part, by shared characteristics of the gut microbiome across individual colony members. These results illustrate the importance of host-microbiome interactions as a source of variation in animal behavioral traits.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal MicrobiomeMicrobiotaAnimalsBeesGroup ProcessesHydrocarbonsRecognition, PsychologyHydrocarbons

Identifiers

PMID33055169
PMCPMC7556842
OpenAlexW3092775619

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.