Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33055096›Full record

ArticleGenome research2020

Accurate reconstruction of bacterial pan- and core genomes with PEPPAN.

Zhemin Zhou, Jane Charlesworth, Mark Achtman

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Genome research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 77 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
77citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

77 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. RefiningMicrobial genomics · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Identification of a Novel Haloarchaeal SpeciesPolish journal of microbiology · 2025
    Article
  15. The Complete Genomes ofMicroorganisms · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

17 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Zhemin ZhouWarwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-9783-0366
Jane CharlesworthWarwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-9759-9838
Mark AchtmanWarwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-6815-0070

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/L020319/1Wellcome Trust 202792/Z/16/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bacterial genomes can contain traces of a complex evolutionary history, including extensive homologous recombination, gene loss, gene duplications, and horizontal gene transfer. To reconstruct the phylogenetic and population history of a set of multiple bacteria, it is necessary to examine their pangenome, the composite of all the genes in the set. Here we introduce PEPPAN, a novel pipeline that can reliably construct pangenomes from thousands of genetically diverse bacterial genomes that represent the diversity of an entire genus. PEPPAN outperforms existing pangenome methods by providing consistent gene and pseudogene annotations extended by similarity-based gene predictions, and identifying and excluding paralogs by combining tree- and synteny-based approaches. The PEPPAN package additionally includes PEPPAN_parser, which implements additional downstream analyses, including the calculation of trees based on accessory gene content or allelic differences between core genes. To test the accuracy of PEPPAN, we implemented SimPan, a novel pipeline for simulating the evolution of bacterial pangenomes. We compared the accuracy and speed of PEPPAN with four state-of-the-art pangenome pipelines using both empirical and simulated data sets. PEPPAN was more accurate and more specific than any of the other pipelines and was almost as fast as any of them. As a case study, we used PEPPAN to construct a pangenome of approximately 40,000 genes from 3052 representative genomes spanning at least 80 species of

Indexed as

Genome, BacterialPhylogenyAlgorithmsBacteriaGenes, BacterialGenomicsPseudogenesSoftwareStreptococcus

Identifiers

PMID33055096
PMCPMC7605250

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.