Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33055094›Full record

SynthesisBMJ global health2020

Use of interrupted time series methods in the evaluation of health system quality improvement interventions: a methodological systematic review.

Celestin Hategeka, Hinda Ruton, Mohammad Karamouzian, Larry D Lynd, Michael R Law

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMJ global health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 120 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
120citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05555095 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

The Medicaid Innovation Collaborative (MIC) Experience: Transforming Care Through Digital Health: A Mixed Methods Analysis

TypeobservationalSponsorOSF Healthcare SystemRan2022 to 2028Enrolled19,331ConditionsHypertension, Diabetes Mellitus, Maternal HealthArmsdigital health delivered multicomponent intervention
NCT07017140 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Immersive Functional Virtual Reality in People With Acquired Brain Injury and Unilateral Spatial Neglect: A Feasibility and Usability Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Vic - Central University of CataloniaRan2025 to 2029Enrolled30ConditionsAcquired Brain Injury Including Stroke, Unilateral Spatial Neglect (USN), Stroke, Traumatic Brain InjuryArmsImmersive Functional Virtual Reality Intervention using a Head-Mounted Display System for Spatial Neglect Rehabilitation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

120 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Impacts of Hurricane-Related Flooding on Time to Initial Cancer-Directed Treatment in North Carolina.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2026
    Observational
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

60 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Celestin HategekaDepartment of Global Health and Population, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA chategeka@hsph.harvard.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-7808-4652
Hinda RutonCentre for Health Services and Policy Research, School of Population and Public Health, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Mohammad KaramouzianSchool of Population and Public Health, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Larry D LyndCollaboration for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Michael R LawCentre for Health Services and Policy Research, School of Population and Public Health, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWhen randomisation is not possible, interrupted time series (ITS) design has increasingly been advocated as a more robust design to evaluating health system quality improvement (QI) interventions given its ability to control for common biases in healthcare QI. However, there is a potential risk of producing misleading results when this rather robust design is not used appropriately. We performed a methodological systematic review of the literature to investigate the extent to which the use of ITS has followed best practice standards and recommendations in the evaluation of QI interventions.

methodsWe searched multiple databases from inception to June 2018 to identify QI intervention studies that were evaluated using ITS. There was no restriction on date, language and participants. Data were synthesised narratively using appropriate descriptive statistics. The risk of bias for ITS studies was assessed using the Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care standard criteria. The systematic review protocol was registered in PROSPERO (registration number: CRD42018094427).

resultsOf 4061 potential studies and 2028 unique records screened for inclusion, 120 eligible studies assessed eight QI strategies and were from 25 countries. Most studies were published since 2010 (86.7%), reported data using monthly interval (71.4%), used ITS without a control (81%) and modelled data using segmented regression (62.5%). Autocorrelation was considered in 55% of studies, seasonality in 20.8% and non-stationarity in 8.3%. Only 49.2% of studies specified the ITS impact model. The risk of bias was high or very high in 72.5% of included studies and did not change significantly over time.

conclusionsThe use of ITS in the evaluation of health system QI interventions has increased considerably over the past decade. However, variations in methodological considerations and reporting of ITS in QI remain a concern, warranting a need to develop and reinforce formal reporting guidelines to improve its application in the evaluation of health system QI interventions.

Indexed as

Delivery of Health CareQuality ImprovementHumansInterrupted Time Series Analysishealth systemssystematic review

Identifiers

PMID33055094
PMCPMC7559052

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.