Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33055061›Full record

ArticleJMIR medical informatics2020

Predictive Models of Mortality for Hospitalized Patients With COVID-19: Retrospective Cohort Study.

Taiyao Wang, Aris Paschalidis, Quanying Liu, Yingxia Liu, Ye Yuan, Ioannis Ch Paschalidis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR medical informatics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Artificial intelligence in clinical care amidst COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Taiyao WangDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Boston University, Boston, MA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0331-3892
Aris PaschalidisBrown University, Providence, RI, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2247-1885
Quanying LiuDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Science and Technology, Shenzen, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2501-7656
Yingxia LiuThird People's Hospital of Shenzhen, Second Hospital Affiliated to Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzen, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6335-3346
Ye YuanSchool of Artificial Intelligence and Automation, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7858-0437
Ioannis Ch Paschalidis *Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Boston University, Boston, MA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3343-2913

Funding

Optimizing and Learning Strategies for Protein Docking R01GM135930 · NIGMS · BOSTON UNIVERSITY (CHARLES RIVER CAMPUS) · PI VAKILI, PIROOZ · 2019 to 2021
$561k
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM135930
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 and its associated disease, COVID-19, have caused worldwide disruption, leading countries to take drastic measures to address the progression of the disease. As SARS-CoV-2 continues to spread, hospitals are struggling to allocate resources to patients who are most at risk. In this context, it has become important to develop models that can accurately predict the severity of infection of hospitalized patients to help guide triage, planning, and resource allocation.

objectiveThe aim of this study was to develop accurate models to predict the mortality of hospitalized patients with COVID-19 using basic demographics and easily obtainable laboratory data.

methodsWe performed a retrospective study of 375 hospitalized patients with COVID-19 in Wuhan, China. The patients were randomly split into derivation and validation cohorts. Regularized logistic regression and support vector machine classifiers were trained on the derivation cohort, and accuracy metrics (F1 scores) were computed on the validation cohort. Two types of models were developed: the first type used laboratory findings from the entire length of the patient's hospital stay, and the second type used laboratory findings that were obtained no later than 12 hours after admission. The models were further validated on a multicenter external cohort of 542 patients.

resultsOf the 375 patients with COVID-19, 174 (46.4%) died of the infection. The study cohort was composed of 224/375 men (59.7%) and 151/375 women (40.3%), with a mean age of 58.83 years (SD 16.46). The models developed using data from throughout the patients' length of stay demonstrated accuracies as high as 97%, whereas the models with admission laboratory variables possessed accuracies of up to 93%. The latter models predicted patient outcomes an average of 11.5 days in advance. Key variables such as lactate dehydrogenase, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, and percentage of lymphocytes in the blood were indicated by the models. In line with previous studies, age was also found to be an important variable in predicting mortality. In particular, the mean age of patients who survived COVID-19 infection (50.23 years, SD 15.02) was significantly lower than the mean age of patients who died of the infection (68.75 years, SD 11.83; P<.001).

conclusionsMachine learning models can be successfully employed to accurately predict outcomes of patients with COVID-19. Our models achieved high accuracies and could predict outcomes more than one week in advance; this promising result suggests that these models can be highly useful for resource allocation in hospitals.

Indexed as

ChinacoronavirusCOVID-19logistic regressionmachine learningmortalitypredictive modelingsupport vector machineWuhan

Identifiers

PMID33055061
PMCPMC7572117

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.