ArticleJournal of ovarian research2020
Comparison of methods for quantifying primordial follicles in the mouse ovary.
Article in Journal of ovarian research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
28 citing papers in PubMed, 53 citations in OpenAlex.
- Follicle identification in primate ovaries via machine learning†.Biology of reproduction · 2026Article
- Enumeration of Microscopic Ovarian Structures in Rodents: Best Practices and Toxicological Significance.Birth defects research · 2026Article
- Mice lacking NF-ĸB1 undergo premature ovarian aging.Reproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E · 2026Article
- ReducediScience · 2026Article
- Combination olaparib and cyclophosphamide cancer therapy exacerbates ovarian reserve depletion in mice with conditional loss ofFrontiers in endocrinology · 2026Article
- Neonatal Mouse Ovary Culture and Whole-mount Follicle Quantification: An Efficient In Vitro Approach for Studying Primordial Follicle Regulation.Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE · 2025Article
- The Effect of Bazedoxifene and Fulvestrant for Preventing Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome: An Experimental Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- The Regulation of ZAR1 on Apoptosis and Mitophagy in Ovarian Granular Cells and Primary Ovarian Insufficiency (POI) Mice.Reproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.) · 2025Article
- CNTD1 is crucial for crossover formation in female meiosis and for establishing the ovarian reserve.The Journal of cell biology · 2025Article
- Classification system of human ovarian follicle morphology: recommendations of the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development - sponsored ovarian nomenclature workshop.Fertility and sterility · 2025Article
- 3D visualization of uterus and ovary: tissue clearing techniques and biomedical applications.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Review
- Automatic ovarian follicle detection using object detection models.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Reproductive safety of STING agonists MSA-2 and manganese-MSA-2.Toxicology research · 2024Article
- Fertility protection during chemotherapy treatment by boosting the NAD(P)EMBO molecular medicine · 2024Article
- Conditional loss of Brca1 in oocytes causes reduced litter size, ovarian reserve depletion and impaired oocyte in vitro maturation with advanced reproductive age in mice.EBioMedicine · 2024Article
- Quantification of follicles in human ovarian tissue using image processing software and trained artificial intelligence†.Biology of reproduction · 2024Article
- EPAS1 expression contributes to maintenance of the primordial follicle pool in the mouse ovary.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Effect of Fixatives and Fixation Period on Morphology and Immunohistochemistry of Feline Ovarian Tissue.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024Article
- Reduced Tumor Volume and Increased Necrosis of Human Breast Tumor Xenograft in Mice Pretreated by a Cocktail of Three Specific Anti-HER2 scFvs.Current protein & peptide science · 2024Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAccurate evaluation of primordial follicle numbers in mouse ovaries is an essential endpoint for studies investigating how endogenous and exogenous insults, such as maternal aging and chemotherapy, impact the ovarian reserve. In this study, we compared and contrasted two methods for counting healthy primordial follicles following exposure to cyclophosphamide (75 mg/kg), a well-established model of follicle depletion. The first was the fractionator/optical dissector technique, an unbiased, assumption-free stereological approach for quantification of primordial follicle numbers. While accurate, highly reproducible and sensitive, this method relies on specialist microscopy equipment and software, requires specific fixation, embedding and sectioning parameters to be followed, and is largely a manual process that is tedious and time-consuming. The second method was the more widely used serial section and direct count approach, which is relatively quick and easy. We also compared the impacts of different fixatives, embedding material and section thickness on the overall results for each method.
resultsDirect counts resulted in primordial follicle numbers that were significantly lower than those obtained by stereology, irrespective of fixation and embedding material. When applied to formalin fixed tissue, the direct count method did not detect differences in follicle numbers between saline and cyclophosphamide treated groups to the same degree of sensitivity as the gold standard stereology method (referred to as the Reference standard). However, when Bouin's fixative was used, direct counts and stereology were comparable in their ability to detect follicle depletion caused by cyclophosphamide.
conclusionsThis work indicates that the direct count method can produce similar results to stereology when Bouin's fixative is used instead of formalin. The findings presented here will assist others to select the most appropriate experimental approach for accurate follicle enumeration, depending on whether the primary objective of the study is to determine absolute primordial follicle numbers or relative differences between groups.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.