Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33054819›Full record

ArticleBMC surgery2020

Odontoid fractures: impact of age and comorbidities on surgical decision making.

Syed Ali Mujtaba Rizvi, Eirik Helseth, Pål Rønning, Jalal Mirzamohammadi, Marianne Efskind Harr, Tor Brommeland, Mads Aarhus, Christina Teisner Høstmælingen, Håvard Ølstørn, Pål Nicolay Fougner Rydning and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC surgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Trends in management of odontoid fractures 2010-2021.North American Spine Society journal · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. The epidemiology of odontoid fractures: a study from the Swedish fracture register.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Risk factors for in-hospital mortality in geriatric patients aged 80 and older with axis fractures: a nationwide, cross-sectional analysis of concomitant injuries, comorbidities, and treatment strategies in 10,077 cases.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Bicycle-related cervical spine injuries.North American Spine Society journal · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Syed Ali Mujtaba RizviFaculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Eirik HelsethFaculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Pål RønningDepartment of Neurosurgery, Oslo University Hospital, Mailbox 4956, 0424, Oslo, Norway.
Jalal MirzamohammadiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Oslo University Hospital, Mailbox 4956, 0424, Oslo, Norway.
Marianne Efskind HarrDepartment of Neurosurgery, Oslo University Hospital, Mailbox 4956, 0424, Oslo, Norway.
Tor BrommelandDepartment of Neurosurgery, Oslo University Hospital, Mailbox 4956, 0424, Oslo, Norway.
Mads AarhusDepartment of Neurosurgery, Oslo University Hospital, Mailbox 4956, 0424, Oslo, Norway.
Christina Teisner HøstmælingenDepartment of Neurosurgery, Oslo University Hospital, Mailbox 4956, 0424, Oslo, Norway.
Håvard ØlstørnDepartment of Neurosurgery, Oslo University Hospital, Mailbox 4956, 0424, Oslo, Norway.
Pål Nicolay Fougner RydningDepartment of Neurosurgery, Oslo University Hospital, Mailbox 4956, 0424, Oslo, Norway.
Magnus Mejlænder-EvjensvoldDepartment of Neuroradiology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Nils Christian UtheimDepartment of Neurosurgery, Oslo University Hospital, Mailbox 4956, 0424, Oslo, Norway.
Hege LinnerudDepartment of Neurosurgery, Oslo University Hospital, Mailbox 4956, 0424, Oslo, Norway. Uxegfr@ous-hf.no.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5177-6197

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSurgical fixation is recommended for type II and III odontoid fractures (OFx) with major translation of the odontoid fragment, regardless of the patient's age, and for all type II OFx in patients aged ≥50 years. The level of compliance with this recommendation is unknown, and our hypothesis is that open surgical fixation is less frequently performed than recommended. We suspect that this discrepancy might be due to the older age and comorbidities among patients with OFx.

methodsWe present a prospective observational cohort study of all patients in the southeastern Norwegian population (3.0 million) diagnosed with a traumatic OFx in the period from 2015 to 2018.

resultsThree hundred thirty-six patients with an OFx were diagnosed, resulting in an overall incidence of 2.8/100000 persons/year. The median age of the patients was 80 years, and 45% were females. According to the Anderson and D'Alonzo classification, the OFx were type II in 199 patients (59%) and type III in 137 patients (41%). The primary fracture treatment was rigid collar alone in 79% of patients and open surgical fixation in 21%. In the multivariate analysis, the following parameters were significantly associated with surgery as the primary treatment: independent living, less serious comorbidities prior to the injury, type II OFx and major sagittal translation of the odontoid fragment. Conversion from external immobilization alone to subsequent open surgical fixation was performed in 10% of patients. Significant differences the in conversion rate were not observed between patients with type II and III fractures. The level of compliance with the treatment recommendations for OFx was low. The main deviation was the underuse of primary surgical fixation for type II OFx. The most common reasons listed for choosing primary external immobilization instead of primary surgical fixation were an older age and comorbidities.

conclusionMajor comorbidities and an older age appear to be significant factors contributing to physicians' decision to refrain from the surgical fixation of OFx. Hence, comorbidities and age should be considered for inclusion in the decision tree for the choice of treatment for OFx in future guidelines.

Indexed as

Decision MakingFracture Fixation, InternalOdontoid ProcessSpinal FracturesAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overChildChild, PreschoolCohort StudiesFemaleHumansInfantMaleMiddle AgedAge factorsComorbidityGuideline adherenceOdontoid process/injuryRisk factorsSpinal fractures/epidemiologySpinal fractures/surgery

Identifiers

PMID33054819
PMCPMC7556921

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.