ArticleBMC surgery2020
Odontoid fractures: impact of age and comorbidities on surgical decision making.
Article in BMC surgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed.
- Surgical versus conservative treatment of odontoid fractures in the elderly: A randomized controlled clinical study (SCORE).PloS one · 2025Trial
- Polypharmacy and anticholinergic burden are common but not independently associated with outcomes after emergency laparotomy in older adults.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2026Observational
- Surgical Outcomes of Craniocervical Junction Fractures in Elderly Patients: A Retrospective Single-Center Series.Journal of personalized medicine · 2025Article
- The management of odontoid fractures through the lens of evolution in classification schemes: A systematic review with illustrative case examples.Brain & spine · 2025Review
- Epidemiology of Traumatic Cervical Spinal Cord Injury in Southeast Norway.Neurotrauma reports · 2025Article
- Trends in management of odontoid fractures 2010-2021.North American Spine Society journal · 2024Article
- Challenges of Treating a C2 Odontoid Fracture in an Elderly Patient With Multiple Comorbidities: A Case Report.Cureus · 2024Article
- Odontoid Fractures: A Review of the Current State of the Art.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- The epidemiology of odontoid fractures: a study from the Swedish fracture register.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2024Article
- Using Frailty Measures to Predict Functional Outcomes and Mortality After Type II Odontoid Fracture in Elderly Patients: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Global spine journal · 2024Article
- Risk factors for in-hospital mortality in geriatric patients aged 80 and older with axis fractures: a nationwide, cross-sectional analysis of concomitant injuries, comorbidities, and treatment strategies in 10,077 cases.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2024Article
- Feasibility of Anterior Fixation with Single Screw for Odontoid Fractures in Pediatrics: A Computed Tomographic Study.Orthopaedic surgery · 2023Article
- Geriatric spine fractures - Demography, changing trends, challenges and special considerations: A narrative review.Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma · 2023Article
- Geriatric Odontoid Fractures: Treatment Algorithms of the German Society for Orthopaedics and Trauma Based on Expert Consensus and a Systematic Review.Global spine journal · 2023Article
- Morbidity and mortality related to type II odontoid fractures in octogenarians undergoing surgery: a retrospective study with 5 year follow up.Frontiers in medicine · 2023Article
- Epidemiology of C2 fractures and determinants of surgical management: analysis of a national registry.Trauma surgery & acute care open · 2023Article
- Bicycle-related cervical spine injuries.North American Spine Society journal · 2022Article
- Epidemiology of traumatic cervical spinal fractures in a general Norwegian population.Injury epidemiology · 2022Article
- Odontoid Type II fractures in elderly: what are the real management goals and how to best achieve them? A multicenter European study on functional outcome.Neurosurgical review · 2022Article
- Understanding the Health Characteristics and Treatment Choices of Older Men with Stress Urinary Incontinence.Urology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSurgical fixation is recommended for type II and III odontoid fractures (OFx) with major translation of the odontoid fragment, regardless of the patient's age, and for all type II OFx in patients aged ≥50 years. The level of compliance with this recommendation is unknown, and our hypothesis is that open surgical fixation is less frequently performed than recommended. We suspect that this discrepancy might be due to the older age and comorbidities among patients with OFx.
methodsWe present a prospective observational cohort study of all patients in the southeastern Norwegian population (3.0 million) diagnosed with a traumatic OFx in the period from 2015 to 2018.
resultsThree hundred thirty-six patients with an OFx were diagnosed, resulting in an overall incidence of 2.8/100000 persons/year. The median age of the patients was 80 years, and 45% were females. According to the Anderson and D'Alonzo classification, the OFx were type II in 199 patients (59%) and type III in 137 patients (41%). The primary fracture treatment was rigid collar alone in 79% of patients and open surgical fixation in 21%. In the multivariate analysis, the following parameters were significantly associated with surgery as the primary treatment: independent living, less serious comorbidities prior to the injury, type II OFx and major sagittal translation of the odontoid fragment. Conversion from external immobilization alone to subsequent open surgical fixation was performed in 10% of patients. Significant differences the in conversion rate were not observed between patients with type II and III fractures. The level of compliance with the treatment recommendations for OFx was low. The main deviation was the underuse of primary surgical fixation for type II OFx. The most common reasons listed for choosing primary external immobilization instead of primary surgical fixation were an older age and comorbidities.
conclusionMajor comorbidities and an older age appear to be significant factors contributing to physicians' decision to refrain from the surgical fixation of OFx. Hence, comorbidities and age should be considered for inclusion in the decision tree for the choice of treatment for OFx in future guidelines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.