Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33054658›Full record

ArticleJournal of applied physiology (Bethesda, Md. : 1985)2020

Sucking versus swallowing coordination, integration, and performance in preterm and term infants.

Christopher J Mayerl, Chloe E Edmonds, Emily A Catchpole, Alexis M Myrla, Francois D H Gould, Laura E Bond, Bethany M Stricklen, Rebecca Z German

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of applied physiology (Bethesda, Md. : 1985), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. The effects of simulated gastroesophageal reflux on infant pig oropharyngeal feeding physiology.American journal of physiology. Gastrointestinal and liver physiology · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Evolution, diversification and function of the maternal-infant dyad in mammalian feeding.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Christopher J MayerlDepartment of Anatomy and Neurobiology, Northeast Ohio Medical University (NEOMED), Rootstown, Ohio.ORCID 0000-0003-0402-8388
Chloe E EdmondsDepartment of Anatomy and Neurobiology, Northeast Ohio Medical University (NEOMED), Rootstown, Ohio.
Emily A CatchpoleDepartment of Anatomy and Neurobiology, Northeast Ohio Medical University (NEOMED), Rootstown, Ohio.
Alexis M MyrlaDepartment of Anatomy and Neurobiology, Northeast Ohio Medical University (NEOMED), Rootstown, Ohio.
Francois D H GouldDepartment of Cell Biology and Neuroscience, Rowan School of Osteopathic Medicine, Stratford, New Jersey.ORCID 0000-0003-3229-2602
Laura E BondDepartment of Anatomy and Neurobiology, Northeast Ohio Medical University (NEOMED), Rootstown, Ohio.
Bethany M StricklenDepartment of Anatomy and Neurobiology, Northeast Ohio Medical University (NEOMED), Rootstown, Ohio.
Rebecca Z GermanDepartment of Anatomy and Neurobiology, Northeast Ohio Medical University (NEOMED), Rootstown, Ohio.ORCID 0000-0001-9989-7847

Funding

The Effect of Preterm Birth and RLN Damage on Airway Protection and MaturationR01HD088561 · NICHD · NORTHEAST OHIO MEDICAL UNIVERSITY · PI GERMAN, REBECCA Z · 2016 to 2020
$2.4M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD088561NICHD NIH HHS R01HD088561
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mammalian infants must be able to integrate the acquisition, transport, and swallowing of food to effectively feed. Understanding how these processes are coordinated is critical, as they have differences in neural control and sensitivity to perturbation. Despite this, most studies of infant feeding focus on isolated processes, resulting in a limited understanding of the role of sensorimotor integration in the different processes involved in infant feeding. This is especially problematic in the context of preterm infants, as they are considered to have pathophysiological brain development and often experience feeding difficulties. Here, we use an animal model to study how the different properties of food acquisition, transport, and swallowing differ between term and preterm infants longitudinally through infancy to understand which processes are sensitive to variation in the bolus being swallowed. We found that term infants are better able to acquire milk than preterm infants, and that properties of acquisition are strongly correlated with the size of the bolus being swallowed. In contrast, behaviors occurring during the pharyngeal swallow, such as hyoid and soft palate movements, show little to no correlation with bolus size. These results highlight the pathophysiological nature of the preterm brain and also demonstrate that behaviors occurring during oral transport are much more likely to respond to sensory intervention than those occurring during the "pharyngeal phase."

Indexed as

DeglutitionSucking BehaviorAnimalsHumansInfantInfant, NewbornInfant, PrematurePharynxfeedinginfantphysiologypretermsensorimotor integrationswallowing

Identifiers

PMID33054658
PMCPMC7792841

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.