Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33054631›Full record

ArticleSexual and reproductive health matters2020

Slowing progress: the US Global Gag Rule undermines access to contraception in Madagascar.

Lantonirina Ravaoarisoa, Mamy Jean Jacques Razafimahatratra, Mamy Andrianina Rakotondratsara, Naomi Gaspard, Marie Rolland Ratsimbazafy, Jean Florent Rafamantanantsoa, Voahanginirina Ramanantsoa, Marta Schaaf, Anne-Caroline Midy, Sara E Casey

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sexual and reproductive health matters, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Lantonirina RavaoarisoaInstitut National de Santé Publique et Communautaire (INSPC), Antananarivo, Madagascar.
Mamy Jean Jacques RazafimahatratraInstitut National de Santé Publique et Communautaire (INSPC), Antananarivo, Madagascar.
Mamy Andrianina RakotondratsaraInstitut National de Santé Publique et Communautaire (INSPC), Antananarivo, Madagascar.
Naomi GaspardHeilbrunn Department of Population and Family Health, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
Marie Rolland RatsimbazafyInstitut National de Santé Publique et Communautaire (INSPC), Antananarivo, Madagascar.
Jean Florent RafamantanantsoaInstitut National de Santé Publique et Communautaire (INSPC), Antananarivo, Madagascar.
Voahanginirina RamanantsoaInstitut National de Santé Publique et Communautaire (INSPC), Antananarivo, Madagascar.
Marta SchaafIndependent Consultant, New York, NY, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7616-5966
Anne-Caroline MidyHeilbrunn Department of Population and Family Health, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
Sara E CaseyHeilbrunn Department of Population and Family Health, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8476-0327
Columbia University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Madagascar's health system is highly dependent on donor funding, especially from the United States (US), and relies on a few nongovernmental organisations (NGOs) to provide contraceptive services in remote areas of the country. The Trump administration reinstated and expanded the Global Gag Rule (GGR) in 2017; this policy requires non-US NGOs receiving US global health funding to certify that neither they nor their sub-grantees will provide, counsel or refer for abortion as a method of family planning. Evidence of the impact of the GGR in a country with restrictive abortion laws, like Madagascar - which has no explicit exception to save the woman's life - is limited. Researchers conducted semi-structured interviews with 259 representatives of the Ministry of Health and NGOs, public and private health providers, community health workers and contraceptive clients in Antananarivo and eight districts between May 2019 and March 2020. Interviews highlighted the impact of the GGR on NGOs that did not certify the policy and lost their US funding. This reduction in funding led to fewer contraceptive service delivery points, including mobile outreach services, a critical component of care in rural areas. Public and private health providers reported increased contraceptive stockouts and fees charged to clients. Although the GGR is ostensibly about abortion, it has reduced access to contraception for the Malagasy population. This is one of few studies to directly document the impact on women who themselves described their increased difficulties obtaining contraception ultimately resulting in discontinuation of contraceptive use, unintended pregnancies and unsafe abortions.

Indexed as

ContraceptionFinancial SupportHealth Services AccessibilityFamily Planning ServicesFemaleHumansMadagascarOrganizationsUnited StatesUnited States Agency for International DevelopmentabortioncontraceptionGlobal Gag RuleMadagascarsexual and reproductive health

Identifiers

PMID33054631
PMCPMC7887949
OpenAlexW3093175007

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.